Back

Light-sheet imaging and graph analysis of antidepressant action in the larval zebrafish brain network

Burgstaller, J.; Hindinger, E.; Donovan, J. C.; Dal Maschio, M.; Kist, A. M.; Gesierich, B.; Portugues, R.; Baier, H.

2019-07-03 neuroscience
10.1101/618843 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The zebrafish is increasingly being employed as an experimental platform to model neuropsychiatric diseases and to screen for novel neuro-active compounds. While the superb genetic and optical access that this system offers has long been recognized, these features have not been fully exploited to investigate disease mechanisms and possible therapeutic interventions. Here we introduce a light-sheet imaging and graph-theoretical analysis pipeline to determine the effects of the known or suspected antidepressant compounds fluoxetine, ketamine and cycloserine on brain-wide neural activity patterns. We imaged the brains of both wildtype fish and grs357 mutants, which harbor a missense mutation that abolishes glucocorticoid receptor transcriptional activity. The grs357 mutation results in a chronically elevated stress axis together with behavioral endophenotypes of depression. Consistent with broad expression of the glucocorticoid receptor throughout the brain, we show that the mutant fish exhibit an altered correlational structure of resting-state brain activity. Intriguingly, in grs357 mutant fish, an increased modularity, which represents the degree of segregation of the network into highly clustered modules, was restored by acute fluoxetine administration to wildtype levels. Ketamine and cycloserine also normalized specific parameters of the graph. Fluoxetine altered network function in the same direction in mutant and wildtype, while ketamine and cycloserine had effects that were opposite for the two genotypes. We propose that light-sheet imaging, followed by graph analysis, is a content-rich and scalable first-pass approach for studying the neural consequences of drug effects and drug x genotype interactions in zebrafish models of psychiatric disorders.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
3
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.2%
4
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
12
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
17
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.5%
27
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%