Microeconomics of metabolism: Overflow metabolism as Giffen behaviour
Yamagishi, J. F.; Hatakeyama, T. S.
Show abstract
Biological systems such as intracellular metabolism are rationally regulated to maximize the cellular growth rate through evolution (1-4), whereas microeconomics investigates the behaviour of consumers assumed to rationally maximize their utility (5, 6). Despite this analogy as optimization problems, the link between biology and economics has not been fully established (7, 8). Here, we developed an exact mapping between the regulation of metabolism and the theory of consumer choice, thereby revealing the correspondence between long-standing mysteries in both fields: overflow metabolism and Giffen behaviour. Overflow metabolism, particularly known as the Warburg effect in cancer (9, 10), is a seemingly wasteful but ubiquitous strategy where cells utilize aerobic glycolysis instead of the more energetically-efficient oxidative phosphorylation (9-16), whereas Giffen behaviour is the unexpected consumer behaviour where a good is demanded more as its price rises (17, 18). We revealed that the general conditions for these phenomena are trade-off and complementarity, i.e., impossibility of substitution for different goods. This correspondence implies that oxidative phosphorylation is counterintuitively stimulated when its efficiency is decreased by metabolic perturbations like drug administration. Therefore, Giffen behaviour bridges the Warburg effect and the reverse and inverse Warburg effect (19-22). This highlights that application of microeconomics to metabolism can offer new predictions and paradigms for both biology and economics.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterosis Related to Fitness and Phenotypic Variance in the Evolution of Diploid Gene Regulatory Network 94%
- Patterns of change in regulatory modules of chemical reaction systems induced by network modification 94%
- A theory of cerebellar learning as a spike-based reinforcement learning in continuous time and space 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.