Reward motivation modulates coding of behaviorally relevant category distinctions across the frontoparietal cortex
Shashidhara, S.; Erez, Y.
Show abstract
Selection and integration of information based on current goals is fundamental for goal-directed behavior. Reward motivation has been shown to improve behavioral performance, yet the neural mechanisms that link motivation and control processes, and in particular its effect on context-dependent information processing, remain unclear. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 24 human volunteers (13 females) to test whether reward motivation enhances the coding of task-relevant information across the frontoparietal cortex, as would be predicted based on previous experimental evidence and theoretical accounts. In a cued target detection task, participants detected whether an object from a cued visual category was present in a subsequent display. The combination of the cue and the object visual category determined the behavioral status of the objects. To manipulate reward motivation, half of all trials offered the possibility of a monetary reward. We observed an increase with reward in overall univariate activity across the frontoparietal control network when the cue and subsequent object were presented. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) showed that behavioral status information for the objects was conveyed across the network. However, in contrast to our prediction, reward did not increase the discrimination between behavioral status conditions in the stimulus epoch of a trial when object information was processed depending on a current context. In the high-level general-object visual region, the lateral occipital complex, the representation of behavioral status was driven by visual differences and was not modulated by reward. Our study provides useful evidence for the limited effects of reward motivation on task-related neural representations and highlights the necessity to unravel the diverse forms and extent of these effects.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Representational organization of novel task sets during proactive encoding. 98%
- Value, confidence, deliberation: a functional partition of the medial prefrontal cortex demonstrated across rating and choice tasks 98%
- Hierarchical representation of multi-step tasks in multiple-demand and default mode networks 98%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Subcortical nuclei of the human ascending arousal system encode anticipated reward but do not predict subsequent memory 97%
- Context-independent scaling of neural responses to task difficulty in the multiple-demand network 97%
- Strategic control of location and ordinal context in visual working memory 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individuation of parts of a single object and multiple distinct objects relies on a common neural mechanism in inferior intraparietal sulcus 96%
- The effect of task demands on the neural patterns generated by novel instruction encoding 96%
- Predicted Utility Modulates Working Memory Fidelity in the Brain 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Abstract neural representations of category membership beyond information coding stimulus or response 97%
- Individual-subject functional localization increases univariate activation but not multivariate pattern discriminability in the 'multiple-demand' frontoparietal network 97%
- Spatial and temporal context jointly modulate the sensory response within the ventral visual stream 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.