Human lateral Frontal Pole contributes to control over social-emotional behaviour
Bramson, B.; Folloni, D.; Verhagen, L.; Hartogsveld, B.; Mars, R. B.; Toni, I.; Roelofs, K.
Show abstract
Regulation of emotional behavior is essential for human social interactions. Recent work has exposed its cognitive complexity, as well as its unexpected reliance on portions of the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC) also involved in exploration, relational reasoning, and counterfactual choice, rather than on dorsolateral and medial prefrontal areas involved in several forms of cognitive control. This study anatomically qualifies the contribution of aPFC territories to the regulation of social-emotional actions, and explores a possible structural pathway through which emotional regulation might be implemented. We provide converging evidence from task-based fMRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, and functional connectivity fingerprints for a novel neural element in emotional regulation. Task-based fMRI in human male participants (N = 40) performing a social-emotional approach-avoidance task identified aPFC territories involved in the regulation of social-emotional actions. Connectivity fingerprints, based on diffusion-weighted imaging and resting-state connectivity, localized those task-defined frontal regions to the lateral frontal pole (FPl), an anatomically-defined portion of the aPFC that lacks a homologous counterpart in macaque brains. Probabilistic tractography indicated that 10-20% of inter-individual variation in social-emotional regulation abilities is accounted for by the strength of structural connectivity between FPl and amygdala. Evidence from an independent replication sample (N = 50; 10 females) further substantiated this result. These findings provide novel neuroanatomical evidence for incorporating FPl in models of control over human social-emotional behavior. Significance statementSuccessful regulation of emotional behaviors is a prerequisite for successful participation in human society, as is evidenced by the social isolation and loss of occupational opportunities often encountered by people suffering from emotion-regulation disorders such as social-anxiety disorder and psychopathy. Knowledge about the precise cortical regions and connections supporting this control is crucial for understanding both the nature of computations needed to successfully traverse the space of possible actions in social situations, and the potential interventions that might result in efficient treatment of social-emotional disorders. This study provides evidence for a precise cortical region (FPl) and a structural pathway (the ventral amygdalofugal bundle) through which a cognitively complex form of emotional action regulation might be implemented in the human brain.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Human subsystems of medial temporal lobes extend locally to amygdala nuclei and globally to an allostatic-interoceptive system 97%
- Segregation, connectivity, and gradients of deactivation in neural correlates of evidence in social decision making 97%
- Reward Enhances Connectivity between the Ventral Striatum and the Default Mode Network 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The influence of relationship closeness on default-mode network connectivity during social interactions 97%
- Graph analysis of the guilt network highlights associations with subclinical anxiety and self-blame 96%
- Mentalizing in an economic games context is associated with enhanced activation and connectivity in left temporoparietal junction 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A tale of two gradients: Differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition and visual reasoning 96%
- The organization of individually mapped structural and functional semantic networks in aging adults 95%
- Heterogeneity of human insular cortex: Five principles of functional organization across multiple cognitive domains 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.