Back

REM negatively predicts statistical learning but not other forms of gist

Matorina, N.; Poppenk, J.

2019-09-25 neuroscience
10.1101/578492 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human memory for recent events is believed to undergo reactivation during sleep. This process is thought to be relevant for the consolidation of both individual episodic memories and gist extraction, the formation of generalized memory representations from multiple, related memories. Which kinds of gist are actually enhanced, however, is the subject of less consensus. To address this question, we focused our design on four types of gist: inferential gist (relations extracted across non-contiguous events), statistical learning (regularities extracted from a series), summary gist (a theme abstracted from a temporally contiguous series of items), and category gist (characterization of a stimulus at a higher level in the semantic hierarchy). Sixty-nine participants (30 men, 38 women, and 1 other) completed memory encoding tasks addressing these types of gist and corresponding retrieval tasks the same evening, the morning after, and one week later. Inferential gist was retained over a week, whereas memory for category gist, summary gist, and statistical learning decayed. Higher proportions of REM were associated with worse performance in a statistical learning task controlling for time. Our results support that REM sleep is involved in schema disintegration, which works against participants ability to identify regularities within temporal series.\n\nSIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTTo gain the most from our experiences, we extract from them the most important elements, or \"gist\", with sleep believed to facilitate this process. However, what is referred to as gist varies considerably across studies. We report categorically different mnemonic trajectories of two classes of gist. In particular, we show that gist involving synthesis across relational memories is retained over time, whereas other gists were subject to substantial decay. Moreover, our evidence supports the idea that REM works to discretize, rather than synthesize experiences. Future research should test similar constructs in different tasks to determine whether these findings are generalizable. Our research suggests that patients with reduced REM sleep may experience more interference between similar memories.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
7
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
12
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
16
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
17
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%