Back

Transcriptomic and Cellular Decoding of Regional Brain Vulnerability to Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Seidlitz, J.; Nadig, A.; Liu, S.; Bethlehem, R. A. I.; Vertes, P. E.; Morgan, S. E.; Vasa, F.; Romero-Garcia, R.; Lalonde, F. M.; Clasen, L. S.; Blumenthal, J. D.; Paquola, C.; Bernhardt, B.; Wagstyl, K.; Polioudakis, D.; de la Torre-Ubieta, L.; Geschwind, D. H.; Han, J. C.; Lee, N. R.; Murphy, D. G.; Bullmore, E. T.; Raznahan, A.

2019-07-29 neuroscience
10.1101/573279 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neurodevelopmental disorders are highly heritable and associated with spatially-selective disruptions of brain anatomy. The logic that translates genetic risks into spatially patterned brain vulnerabilities remains unclear but is a fundamental question in disease pathogenesis. Here, we approach this question by integrating (i) in vivo neuroimaging data from patient subgroups with known causal genomic copy number variations (CNVs), and (ii) bulk and single-cell gene expression data from healthy cortex. First, for each of six different CNV disorders, we show that spatial patterns of cortical anatomy change in youth are correlated with spatial patterns of expression for CNV region genes in bulk cortical tissue from typically-developing adults. Next, by transforming normative bulk-tissue cortical expression data into cell-type expression maps, we further link each disorders anatomical change map to specific cell classes and specific CNV-region genes that these cells express. Finally, we establish convergent validity of this "transcriptional vulnerability model" by inter-relating patient neuroimaging data with measures of altered gene expression in both brain and blood-derived patient tissue. Our work clarifies general biological principles that govern the mapping of genetic risks onto regional brain disruption in neurodevelopmental disorders. We present new methods that can harness these principles to screen for potential cellular and molecular determinants of disease from readily available patient neuroimaging data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.