Back

Towards an individualised neural assessment of receptive language in children

Petit, S.; Badcock, N. A.; Grootswagers, T.; Rich, A. N.; Brock, J.; Nickels, L.; Moerel, D.; Dermody, N.; Yau, S.; Schmidt, E.; Woolgar, A.

2020-04-19 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/566752 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeWe aimed to develop a non-invasive neural test of language comprehension to use with non-speaking children for whom standard behavioural testing is unreliable (e.g., minimally-verbal autism). Our aims were three-fold. First, we sought to establish the sensitivity of two auditory paradigms to elicit neural responses in individual neurotypical children. Second, we aimed to validate the use of a portable and accessible electroencephalography (EEG) system, by comparing its recordings to those of a research-grade system. Third, in light of substantial inter-individual variability in individuals neural responses, we assessed whether multivariate decoding methods could improve sensitivity. MethodsWe tested the sensitivity of two child-friendly covert N400 paradigms. Thirty-one typically developing children listened to identical spoken words that were either strongly predicted by the preceding context or violated lexical-semantic expectations. Context was given by a cue word (Experiment 1) or sentence frame (Experiment 2) and participants either made an overall judgement on word relatedness or counted lexical-semantic violations. We measured EEG concurrently from a research-grade system, Neuroscans SynAmps2, and an adapted gaming system, Emotivs EPOC+. ResultsWe found substantial inter-individual variability in the timing and topology of N400-like effects. For both paradigms and EEG systems, traditional N400 effects at the expected sensors and time points were statistically significant in around 50% of individuals. Using multivariate analyses, detection rate increased to 88% of individuals for the research-grade system in the sentences paradigm, illustrating the robustness of this method in the face of inter-individual variations in topography. ConclusionsThere was large inter-individual variability in neural responses, suggesting inter-individual variation in either the cognitive response to lexical-semantic violations, and/or the neural substrate of that response. Around half of our neurotypical participants showed the expected N400 effect at the expected location and time point. A low-cost, accessible EEG system provided comparable data for univariate analysis but was not well suited to multivariate decoding. However, multivariate analyses with a research-grade EEG system increased our detection rate to 88% of individuals. This approach provides a strong foundation to establish a neural index of language comprehension in children with limited communication.

Published in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research (predicted rank #18) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.8%
2
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
3
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.3%
5
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
6
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
8
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
12
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
14
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
15
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · published here
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
21
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
22
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%