The complexity dividend: when sophisticated inference matters
Tavoni, G.; Doi, T.; Pizzica, C.; Balasubramanian, V.; Gold, J. I.
Show abstract
Animals continuously infer latent properties of the world from noisy and changing observations. Complex approaches to this challenge such as Bayesian inference are accurate but cognitively demanding, requiring extensive working memory and adaptive learning. Simple strategies such as always using a prior bias or following the last observation are easy to implement but may be less accurate. What is the appropriate balance between complexity and accuracy? We construct a hierarchy of strategies that vary in complexity between these limits and find a power law of diminishing returns: increasing complexity gives progressively smaller gains in accuracy. Moreover, the rate at which the gain decrements depends systematically on the statistical uncertainty in the world, such that complex strategies do not provide substantial benefits over simple ones when uncertainty is too high or too low. In between, when the world is neither too predictable nor too unpredictable, there is a complexity dividend.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between frequency content and representational dynamics in the decoding of neurophysiological data 94%
- Forward planning driven by context-dependent conflict processing in anterior cingulate cortex 93%
- Valid and powerful group statistics for decoding accuracy: Information Prevalence Inference using the i-th order statistic (i-test) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.