Back

Prodrug defiance reveals logic-based strategies for treating bacterial resistance

Holt, B. A.; Curro, I.; Kwong, G. A.

2019-09-23 bioengineering
10.1101/556951 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Classifying the mechanisms of antibiotic failure has led to the development of new treatment strategies for killing bacteria. Among the currently described mechanisms, which include resistance, persistence and tolerance, we propose bacterial defiance as a form of antibiotic failure specific to prodrugs. As a prototypic model of a bacteria-activated prodrug, we construct cationic antimicrobial peptides (AMP), which are charge neutralized until activated by a bacterial protease. This construct successfully eliminated the vast majority of bacteria populations, while localizing activity to bacterial membranes and maintaining low active drug concentration. However, we observed defiant bacteria populations, which survive in the presence of identical drug concentration and exposure time. Using a multi-rate kinetic feedback model, we show that bacteria switch between susceptibility and defiance under clinically relevant environmental (e.g., hyperthermia) and genetic (e.g., downregulated protease expression) conditions. From this model, we derive a dimensionless quantity (Bacterial Advantage Heuristic, BAH) - representing the balance between bacterial proliferation and prodrug activation - that perfectly classifies bacteria as defiant or susceptible across a broad range of conditions. To apply this concept to other classes of prodrugs, we expand this model to include both linear and nonlinear terms and use general pharmacokinetic parameters (e.g., half-life, EC50, etc.). Taken together, this model reveals an analogous dimensionless quantity (General Advantage Key, GAK), which can applied to prodrugs with different activation mechanisms. We envision that these studies will enable the development of more effective prodrugs to combat antibiotic resistance.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.0%
2
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.5%
4
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
5
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
6
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.3%
9
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.0%
13
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
14
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
15
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
17
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.1%
20
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
22
Nature Nanotechnology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%