Back

Linear mapping of region-to-region connectivity as a basic principle of visual and prefrontal functional organization alike

O'Rawe, J. F.; Leung, H.-C.

2019-08-17 neuroscience
10.1101/549345 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Describing the pattern of region-to-region functional connectivity is an important step towards understanding information transfer and transformation between brain regions. Although fMRI data are limited in spatial resolution, recent advances in technology afford more precise mapping. Here, we extended previous methods, connective field mapping, to 3 dimensions to provide a more concise estimate of the organization and potential information transformation from one region to another. We first replicated previous work with the 3 dimensional model by showing that the topology of functional connectivity between early visual regions maintained along their eccentricity axis or the anterior-posterior dimension. We then examined higher order visual regions (e,g, fusiform face area) and showed that their pattern of connectivity, the convergence and biased sampling, seem to contribute to some of their core receptive field properties. We further demonstrated that linearity of input is a fundamental aspect of functional connectivity of the whole brain, with higher linearity between regions within a network than across networks; that is, high connective linearity was evident between early visual areas, and between prefrontal areas, but less evident between them. By decomposing the whole brain linearity matrix with manifold learning techniques, we found that the principle mode of the linearity maps onto decompositions in both functional connectivity and genetic expression reported in previous studies. The current work provides evidence supporting that linearity of input is likely a fundamental motif of functional connectivity between regions for information processing across the brain, with high linearity preserving the integrity of information from one region to another within a network.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.