Back

Impaired M-current in KCNQ2 Encephalopathy Evokes Dyshomeostatic Modulation of Excitability

Simkin, D.; Searl, T. J.; Piyevsky, B. N.; Forrest, M.; Williams, L. A.; Joshi, V.; Zhang, H.; Ryan, S. J.; Schwake, M.; Robertson, G. L.; Penzes, P.; Laux, L. C.; McManus, O. B.; Dempsey, G. T.; Millichap, J. J.; George, A. L.; Kiskinis, E.

2020-09-22 neuroscience
10.1101/538371 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mutations in KCNQ2, which encodes a pore-forming K+ channel subunit responsible for neuronal M-current, cause neonatal epileptic encephalopathy, a complex disorder presenting with severe early-onset seizures and impaired neurodevelopment. The condition is exceptionally difficult to treat, partially because the effects of KCNQ2 mutations on the development and function of human neurons are unknown. Here, we used induced pluripotent stem cells and gene editing to establish a disease model, and measured the functional properties of patient-derived neurons using electrophysiological and optical approaches. We find that while patient-derived excitatory neurons exhibit reduced M-current early, they develop intrinsic and network hyperexcitability progressively. This hyperexcitability is associated with faster action potential repolarization, larger afterhyperpolarization, and a functional enhancement of large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (BK) channels. These properties facilitate a burst-suppression firing pattern that is reminiscent of the interictal electroencephalography pattern in patients. Importantly, we were able to phenocopy these excitability features in control neurons only by chronic but not acute pharmacological inhibition of M-current. Our findings suggest that dyshomeostatic mechanisms compound KCNQ2 loss-of-function and lead to alterations in the neurodevelopmental trajectory of patient-derived neurons. Our work has therapeutic implications in explaining why KCNQ2 agonists are not beneficial unless started at an early disease stage.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.