Non-Invasive Detection of Viral Antibodies Using Oral Flocked Swabs
Speicher, D. J.; Luinstra, K.; Smith, E. J.; Castriciano, S.; Smieja, M.
Show abstract
Salivary antibodies are useful in surveillance and vaccination studies. However, low antibody levels and degradation by endonucleases are problematic. Oral flocked swabs are a potential non-invasive alternative to blood for detecting viral antibodies. Serum and saliva collected from 50 healthy volunteers were stored at -80{degrees}C; dried swabs at room temperature. Seroprevalence for Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Measles and Mumps IgG antibodies were determined using commercial ELISAs and processed on an automated platform. For each antibody, swabs correlated well with saliva. For CMV IgG, VZV IgG, and EBV EBNA-1 IgG and VCA IgG, the swab sensitivities compared to serum were 95.8%, 96%, 92.1% and 95.5% respectively. For Measles IgG, swab sensitivity was 84.5%. Mumps IgG displayed poor sensitivity for oral swabs (60.5%) and saliva (68.2%). Specificities for IgG antibodies were 100% for CMV, EBV and Mumps. Specificities for VZV and Measles could not be determined due to seropositive volunteers. As oral flocked swabs correlate well with serum, are easy to self-collect and stable at room temperature further research is warranted. HighlightsO_LIOral flocked swabs are an easy, self-collection method for measuring viral antibodies. C_LIO_LIViral IgG is stable on dried oral flocked swabs for at least two years. C_LIO_LIOral swabs are highly sensitive for CMV, VZV, and EBV IgG. C_LIO_LIOral swabs are potentially useful for surveillance and clinical microbiology. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a highly sensitive and specific electrochemical assay to quantify anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies to facilitate pandemic surveillance and monitoring of vaccine response 95%
- Development and Implementation of a Simple and Rapid Extraction-Free Saliva SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP Workflow for Workplace Surveillance 95%
- Rapid processing of SARS-CoV-2 containing specimens for direct RT-PCR 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Direct comparison of clinical diagnostic sensitivity of saliva from buccal swabs versus combined oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron 95%
- Is the glass half full? Extraction-free RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 is less sensitive but highly specific compared to standard RT-PCR in 101 samples 94%
- Comparison of Cepheid Xpert Xpress and Abbott ID Now to Roche cobas for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methodological approaches to optimize multiplex oral fluid SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay performance and correlation with serologic and neutralizing antibody responses 94%
- Comparative analyses of SARS-CoV-2 binding (IgG, IgM, IgA) and neutralizing antibodies from human serum samples 93%
- Performance and validation of an adaptable multiplex assay for detection of serologic response to SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.