A Single-Molecule Long-Read Survey of Human Transcriptomes using LoopSeq Synthetic Long Read Sequencing
Wu, I.; Kim, H. S.; Ben-Yehezkel, T.
Show abstract
State-of-the-art short-read transcriptome sequencing methods employ unique molecular identifier (UMI) to accurately classify and count mRNA transcripts. A fundamental limitation of UMI-based short-read transcriptome sequencing is that each read typically covers a small fraction of the transcript sequence. Efforts to accurately characterize splicing isoforms, arguably the largest source of variation in Human gene expression, using short read sequencing have therefore largely relied on computational predictions of transcript isoforms based on indirect observations. Here we describe a transcript counting, synthetic long read method for sequencing whole transcriptomes using short read sequencing platforms and no additional hardware. The method enables full-length mRNA sequence reconstruction at single-nucleotide resolutions with high-throughput, low error rates and UMI based transcript counting using any Illumina sequencer. We describe results from whole transcriptome sequencing from total RNA extracted from 3 human tissue samples: brain, liver, and blood. Reconstructed transcript sequences are characterized and annotated using SQANTI, an analysis pipeline for assessing the sequence quality of long-read transcriptomes. Our results demonstrate that LoopSeq synthetic long-read sequencing can reconstruct contigs up to 3,900nt full-length transcripts using tissue extracted RNA, as well as identify novel splice variants of known junction donors and acceptors.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Illuminating the dark side of the human transcriptome with TAMA Iso-Seq analysis 96%
- Comprehensive assessment of multiple biases in small RNA sequencing reveals significant differences in the performance of widely used methods 94%
- Flexible, Production-Scale, Human Whole Genome Sequencing On A Benchtop Sequencer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.