Spatial and feature-selective attention have distinct effects on population-level tuning.
Goddard, E.; Carlson, T. A.; Woolgar, A.
Show abstract
Attention is a fundamental brain process by which we selectively prioritize relevant information in our environment. Cognitively, we can employ different methods for selecting visual information for further processing, but the extent to which these are implemented by similar or different neural processes remains unclear. Spatial and feature-selective attention both change the stimulus related information signaled by single-cells and neural populations, but relatively few studies have directly compared the effects of these distinct types of attention. We scanned participants (n=20) using MEG, while they covertly attended to an object on the left or the right of fixation (spatial attention manipulation) and reported the objects shape or color (feature-selective attention manipulation). We used multivariate pattern classification to measure population stimulus-coding in occipital and frontal areas, for attended and non-attended stimulus features, at attended and non-attended locations. In occipital cortex, we show that both spatial and feature-selective attention enhanced object representations, and the effects of these two attention types interacted multiplicatively. We also found that spatial and feature-selective attention induced qualitatively different patterns of enhancement in occipital cortex for the encoding of stimulus color. Specifically, feature-based attention primarily enhanced small color differences, while spatial attention produced greater enhancement for larger differences. We demonstrate that principles of response-gain and tuning curve sharpening that have been applied to describe the effects of attention at the level of a single neuron can account for these differences. An information flow analysis suggested that these attentional effects may be driven by feedback from frontal areas.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial predictive context speeds up visual search by biasing local attentional competition 97%
- Variable processing shifts during perceptual acceleration: Evidence from temporal integration 97%
- Linking the brain with behaviour: the neural dynamics of success and failure in goal-directed behaviour 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Independent spatiotemporal effects of spatial attention and background clutter on human object location representations 98%
- Top-down specific preparatory activations for Selective Attention and Perceptual Expectations 97%
- Rapid contextualization of fragmented scene information in the human visual system 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Visual periodicity reveals distinct attentional signatures for face and non-face categories 97%
- Objects sharpen visual scene representations: evidence from MEG decoding 97%
- Semantic scene-object consistency modulates N300/400 EEG components, but does not automatically facilitate object representations 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.