Transcranial or non-transcranial stimulation? Results of a combined TMS-EEG feasibility study
Krawinkel, L. A.; Forisch, J.; Feldheim, J. F.; Backhaus, W.; Quandt, F.; Gerloff, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundEntrainment of cortical oscillations by repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is an attractive approach to modulate brain function non-invasively in humans. Here, we applied rTMS in order to modulate oscillatory activity in ventral premotor cortex (PMv), primary motor cortex (M1), and anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS). These areas are thought to contribute to recovery after motor stroke and our overarching goal is to enhance their impact by rTMS. To this end, we established a setup with bifocal, neuronavigated rTMS combined with EEG and tested its technical feasibility. MethodsBifocal zero-phase lag synchronized rTMS at 11Hz was applied in seven young healthy volunteers to the target pairs (i) PMv and M1 and (ii) aIPS and M1. Adapting to the close vicinity between target areas, we used two small, commercially available coils and applied subthreshold stimuli in order to avoid motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Besides a parieto-occipital sham stimulation, we also included auditory and sensory stimulation in a further control experiment. ResultsFirst, subthreshold TMS led to a phase synchronization and evoked time-averaged potentials in the EEG. However, the same findings could be elicited by peripheral, somatosensory stimulation combined with auditory stimulation. Second, despite the small coils neuronavigation analysis showed that in most participants aIPS and M1 or PMv and M1 could not precisely be targeted due to their vicinity and restriction in coil positioning. Third, bifocal subthreshold rTMS tended to sum up where the induced fields showed the greatest overlap resulting in overt MEPs and thus raising potential safety issues. ConclusionsThe presented data show refinements for bifocal rTMS studies regarding (i) spurious entrainment or resetting effects on brain oscillations, (ii) precise anatomical targeting of areas in close vicinity, and (iii) summing up of overlapping induced electrical fields.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Transferability of cathodal tDCS effects from the primary motor to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a multimodal TMS-EEG study 97%
- The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability 97%
- Does pericentral mu-rhythm power corticomotor excitability? A matter of EEG perspective 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-retest reliability of intrahemispheric dorsal premotor and primary motor cortex dual-site TMS connectivity measures 96%
- Real-time optimization to enhance noninvasive cortical excitability assessment in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex 95%
- Probing the orientation specificity of excitatory and inhibitory circuitries in the primary motor cortex with multi-channel TMS 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stimulation parameters shape effective connectivity pathways: insights from microstate analysis on TMS-evoked potentials 97%
- Forearm and hand muscles exhibit high coactivation and overlapping of cortical motor representations 96%
- Qualitative and Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Common Normal Variants and Physiological Artifacts in MEG and EEG 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The rt-TEP tool: real-time visualization of TMS-Evoked Potential to maximize cortical activation and minimize artifacts 97%
- Designing and comparing cleaning pipelines for TMS-EEG data: a theoretical overview and practical example 95%
- Proper reference selection and re-referencing to mitigate bias in single pulse electrical stimulation data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.