Eco-evo-devo implications and archaeobiological perspectives of wild and domesticated grapevines fruits covariating traits
Bonhomme, V.; Picq, S.; Ivorra, S.; Evin, A.; Pastor, T.; Bacilieri, R.; Lacombe, T.; Figueiral, I.; Terral, J.-F.; Bouby, L.
Show abstract
The phenotypic changes that occurred during the domestication and diversification of grapevine are well known, particularly changes in seed morphology, but the functional causes and consequences behind these variations are poorly understood. Wild and domesticate grapes differ, among others, in the form of their pips: wild grapes produce roundish pips with short stalks and cultivated varieties have more elongated pips with longer stalks. Such variations of form are of first importance for archaeobotany since the pip form is, most often, the only remaining information in archaeological settings. This study aims to enlight archaeobotanical record and grapevine pip development by better understanding how size and shape (co)variates between pip and berry in both wild and domesticated Vitis vinifera. The covariation of berry size, number of seeds per berry ("piposity"), pip size and pip shape were explored on 49 grapevine accessions sampled among Euro-Mediterranean traditional cultivars and wild grapevines. We show that for wild grapevine, the higher the piposity, the bigger the berry and the more elongated the pip. For both wild and domesticated grapevine, the longer is the pip, the more it has a "domesticated" shape. Consequences for archaeobotanical studies are tested and discussed, and these covariations allowed the inference of berry dimensions from archaeological pips from a Southern France Roman site. This systematic exploration sheds light on new aspects of pip-berry relationship, in both size and shape, on grapevine eco-evo-devo changes during domestication, and invites to explore further the functional ecology of grapevine pip and berry and notably the impact of cultivation practices and human selection on grapevine morphology.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving yield and fruit quality traits in sweet passion fruit: evidence for genotype by environment interaction and cross-compatibility in selected genotypes 94%
- Genetic structure and molecular diversity of Brazilian grapevine germplasm: management and use in breeding programs 94%
- Germplasm of Brazilian winter squash (Cucurbita moschata D.) displays vast genetic variability, allowing identification of promising genotypes for agro-morphological traits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptomic analysis of temporal shifts in berry development between two grapevine cultivars of the Pinot family reveals potential genes controlling ripening time 94%
- A Sense of Place: Transcriptomics Identifies Environmental Signatures in Cabernet Sauvignon Berry Skins in the Late Stages of Ripening. 93%
- The genetics of fruit skin separation in date palm 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging foundation models to dissect the genetic basis of cluster compactness and yield in grapevine 94%
- Predicting flowering time using integrated morphophysiological and genomic data with machine learning models 92%
- Evidence for the Involvement of Vernalization-related Genes in the Regulation of Cold-induced Ripening in 'D'Anjou' and 'Bartlett' Pear Fruit 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-location trials and population-based genotyping reveal high diversity and adaptation to breeding environments in a large collection of red clover 93%
- Exogenous application of non-mature miRNA-encoded miPEP164c inhibits proanthocyanidin synthesis and stimulates anthocyanin accumulation in grape berry cells 93%
- The modified activity of prolyl 4 hydroxylases (P4Hs) reveals the effect of arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) on changes in the cell wall during the tomato ripening process 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.