Back

Rigorous equations for isothermal titration calorimetry: theoretical and practical consequences

Dumas, P.

2021-11-06 biophysics
10.1101/512780 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The author has withdrawn his manuscript because: The withdrawn preprint was about methodological aspects in Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) used to obtain thermodynamic information about reactions like A + B {rightleftarrows} C where A is initially in the cell and B injected from a syringe. The preprint considered the two possible methods in ITC: 1/ the Multiple Injection Method (MIM) making use of short-time injections separated by sufficient time to allow the reaction to reach equilibrium before a new injection. 2/ the Single Injection Method (SIM) making use of a slow continuous injection. The first result mentioned is about a new equation linking the rate of heat evolution with the injected volume (equations 9 and 10). With this equation and with the hypothesis that there is always perfect mixing of the cell content it was concluded that an ideal titration curve (i.e. not affected by any external influence) for a simple reaction like A + B {rightleftarrows} C cannot change sign (section 3.2). This conclusion turns out to be incorrect when taking in consideration real conditions with imperfect mixing, particularly with MIM using injections often of very short duration, which prevents from reaching perfect mixing. The major problem is that this erroneous conclusion was accompanied with comparisons of the results from well-established programs, which led to the conclusion that these were in error on this point (section 3.6). I therefore felt necessary to withdraw this preprint to avoid casting doubts unduly on these programs used extensively. Note that many other aspects in this preprint remain correct (section 3.8). A new version of this work, limited to SIM and considering imperfect mixing, will be submitted for publication under the title: "Isothermal titration calorimetry in the single-injection mode with imperfect mixing". If you have any questions, please contact me at dumasp@igbmc.fr or at p.dumas@unistra.fr Sorry for the inconvenience. Philippe Dumas November 6, 2021

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.1%
2
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.0%
5
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
8
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
10
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
The European Physical Journal E
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
28
Glycobiology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%