Modulation of tonotopic ventral MGB is behaviorally relevant for speech recognition.
Mihai, P. G.; Moerel, M.; de Martino, F.; Trampel, R.; Kiebel, S.; von Kriegstein, K.
Show abstract
Recognising speech in background noise is a strenuous daily activity, yet most humans can master it. An explanation of how the human brain deals with such sensory uncertainty during speech recognition is to-date missing. Previous work has shown that recognition of speech without background noise involves modulation of the auditory thalamus (medial geniculate body, MGB): There are higher responses in left MGB for speech recognition tasks that require tracking of fast-varying stimulus properties in contrast to relatively constant stimulus properties (e.g., speaker identity tasks) despite the same stimulus input. Here we tested the hypotheses that (i) this task-dependent modulation for speech recognition increases in parallel with the sensory uncertainty in the speech signal, i.e., the amount of background noise and that (ii) this increase is present in the ventral MGB, which corresponds to the primary sensory part of the auditory thalamus. In accordance with our hypothesis, we show--by using ultra-high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging in human participants--that the task-dependent modulation of the left vMGB for speech is particularly strong when recognizing speech in noisy listening conditions in contrast to situations where the speech signal is clear. Exploratory analyses showed that this finding was specific to the left vMGB; it was not present in the right vMGB or the midbrain structure of the auditory pathway (left inferior colliculus, IC). The results imply that speech in noise recognition is supported by modifications at the level of the subcortical sensory pathway providing driving input to the auditory cortex. Significance StatementSpeech recognition in noisy environments is a challenging everyday task. One reason why humans can master this task is the recruitment of additional cognitive resources as reflected in recruitment of non-language cerebral cortex areas. Here, we show that also modulation in the primary sensory pathway is specifically involved in speech in noise recognition. We found that the left primary sensory thalamus (ventral medial geniculate body, vMGB) is more involved when recognizing speech signals as opposed to a control task (speaker identity recognition) when heard in background noise vs. when the noise was absent. This finding implies that the brain optimises sensory processing in subcortical sensory pathway structures in a task-specific manner to deal with speech recognition in noisy environments.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Speech sound categorization: The contribution of non-auditory and auditory cortical regions 96%
- Language beyond the language system: dorsal visuospatial pathways support processing of demonstratives and spatial language during naturalistic fast fMRI 96%
- Differential effects of prediction error and adaptation along the auditory cortical hierarchy during deviance processing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metamodal Coupling of Vibrotactile and Auditory Speech Processing Systems Through Matched Stimulus Representations 96%
- Structural and functional network-level reorganization in the coding of auditory motion directions and sound source locations in the absence of vision 96%
- Voxelwise encoding models show that cerebellar language representations are highly conceptual 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Relations between hemispheric asymmetries of grey matter and auditory processing of spoken syllables in 281 healthy adults 95%
- Dissociated face- and word-selective intracerebral responses in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex 94%
- Differential contributions of left-hemispheric language regions to basic semantic composition 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.