Motor skill learning decreases motor variability and increases planning horizon
Bashford, L.; Kobak, D.; Diedrichsen, J.; Mehring, C.
Show abstract
We investigated motor skill learning using a path tracking task, where human subjects had to track various curved paths at a constant speed while maintaining the cursor within the path width. Subjects accuracy increased with practice, even when tracking novel untrained paths. Using a "searchlight" paradigm, where only a short segment of the path ahead of the cursor was shown, we found that subjects with a higher tracking skill differed from the novice subjects in two respects. First, they had lower motor variability, in agreement with previous findings. Second, they took a longer section of the future path into account when performing the task, i.e. had a longer planning horizon. We estimate that between one third and one half of the performance increase was due to the increase in planning horizon. An optimal control model with a fixed horizon (receding horizon control) that increases with tracking skill quantitatively captured the subjects movement behaviour. These findings demonstrate that human subjects not only increase their motor acuity but also their planning horizon when acquiring a motor skill. New and NoteworthyWe show that when learning a motor skill humans are using information about the environment from an increasingly longer amount of the movement path ahead to improve performance. Crucial features of the behavioural performance can be captured by modelling the behavioural data with a receding horizon optimal control model.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Saccade vigor partly reflects the subjective economic value of the visual stimulus 96%
- Humans sacrifice decision-making for action execution when a demanding control of movement is required 96%
- Online interference of declarative memory on fast and slow adaptive processes in force field motor learning 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.