Medial prefrontal cortex activity reflects ordinal retrieval modes and hippocampal activity reflects temporal context retrieval modes
Reeders, P. C.; Hamm, A. G.; Allen, T. A.; Mattfeld, A. T.
Show abstract
Remembering sequences of events defines episodic memory, but retrieval can be driven by both ordinality and temporal contexts. Whether these modes of retrieval operate at the same time or not remains unclear. Theoretically, medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) confers ordinality, while the hippocampus (HC) associates events in gradually changing temporal contexts. Here, we looked for evidence of each with BOLD fMRI in a sequence task that taxes both retrieval modes. To test ordinal modes, items were transferred between sequences but retained their position (e.g., AB3). Ordinal modes activated mPFC, but not HC. To test temporal contexts, we examined items that skipped ahead across lag distances (e.g., ABD). HC, but not mPFC, tracked temporal contexts. There was a mPFC and HC by retrieval mode interaction. These current results suggest that the mPFC and HC are concurrently engaged in different retrieval modes in support of remembering when an event occurred. Significance StatementMemory for sequences of events is a defining aspect of everyday episodic memory allowing our brain to separate unique experiences that otherwise have overlapping sensory and spatial content. Sequence memory is impaired in typical aging and in disorders such as Alzheimers disease. The results of the current study provide new evidence that two retrieval modes concurrently arise during sequence memory, and they have distinct neural correlates. The medial prefrontal cortex contributes to an ordinal retrieval mode, while at the same time, the hippocampus contributes a gradually-changing temporal context mode of retrieval. These data shed new light on why typical episodic memory requires both the medial prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus, and suggests a functional dissociation between the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus across these modes of retrieval.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Contributions from Long-Term Memory Explain Superior Visual Working Memory Performance with Meaningful Objects 97%
- Experiencing surprise: the temporal dynamics of its impact on memory 97%
- An enduring role for hippocampal pattern completion in addition to an emergent non-hippocampal contribution to holistic episodic retrieval after a 24-hour delay 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction errors for aversive events shape long-term memory formation through a distinct neural mechanism 96%
- Strategic control of location and ordinal context in visual working memory 96%
- The locus of recognition memory signals in human cortex depends on the complexity of the memory representations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microstructural organization of Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus and Cingulum Bundle support metacognition driven cognitive offloading 96%
- Integrating memories: Congruency and reactivation aid memory integration through reinstatement of prior knowledge 95%
- Outcome contingency selectively affects the neural coding of outcomes but not of tasks 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.