Back

The genetic robustness of RNA and protein from evolutionary, structural and functional perspectives

Coray, D. S.; Sibaeva, N.; McGimpsey, S.; Gardner, P. P.

2019-10-29 molecular biology
10.1101/480087 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The reactions of functional molecules like proteins and RNAs to mutation affect both host cell viability and biomolecular evolution. These molecules are considered robust if function is maintained despite mutations. Proteins and RNAs have different structural and functional characteristics that affect their robustness, and to date, comparisons between them have been theoretical. In this work, we test the relative mutational robustness of RNA and protein pairs using three approaches: evolutionary, structural, and functional. We compare the nucleotide diversities of functional RNAs with those of matched proteins. Across different levels of conservation, we found the nucleotide-level variations between the biomolecules largely overlapped, with proteins generally supporting more variation than matched RNAs. We then directly tested the robustness of the protein and RNA pairs with in vitro and in silico mutagenesis of their respective genes. The in silico experiments showed that proteins and RNAs reacted similarly to point mutations and insertions or deletions, yet proteins are slightly more robust on average than RNAs. In vitro, mutated fluorescent RNAs retained greater levels of function than the proteins. Overall this suggests that proteins and RNAs have remarkably similar degrees of robustness, with the average protein having moderately higher robustness than RNA as a group.\n\nSignificance StatementThe ability of proteins and non-coding RNAs to maintain function despite mutations in their respective genes is known as mutational robustness. Robustness impacts how molecules maintain and change phenotypes, which has a bearing on the evolution and the origin of life as well as influencing modern biotechnology. Both protein and RNA have mechanisms that allow them to absorb DNA-level changes. Proteins have a redundant genetic code and non-coding RNAs can maintain structure and function through flexible base-pairing possibilities. The few theoretical treatments comparing protein and RNA robustness differ in their conclusions. In this experimental comparison of protein and RNA, we find that they have remarkably similar degrees of overall genetic robustness.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.9%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
17
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
23
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
25
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
30
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%