MR-TRYX: A Mendelian randomization framework that exploits horizontal pleiotropy to infer novel causal pathways
Cho, Y.; Haycock, P. C.; Sanderson, E.; Gaunt, T. R.; Zheng, J.; Morris, A. P.; Davey Smith, G.; Hemani, G.
Show abstract
In Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, variants that exert horizontal pleiotropy are typically treated as a nuisance. However, they could be valuable in identifying novel pathways to the traits under investigation. Here, we developed the MR-TRYX framework, following the advice of William Bateson to \"TReasure Your eXceptions\". We begin by detecting outliers in a single exposure-outcome MR analysis, hypothesising they are due to horizontal pleiotropy. We search across thousands of complete GWAS summary datasets in the MR-Base database to systematically identify other (\"candidate\") traits that associate with the outliers. We developed a multi-trait pleiotropy model of the heterogeneity in the exposure-outcome analysis due to pathways through candidate traits. Through detailed investigation of several causal relationships, many pleiotropic pathways were uncovered with already established causal effects, validating the approach, but also novel putative causal pathways. Adjustment for pleiotropic pathways reduced the heterogeneity across the analyses.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Testing and controlling for horizontal pleiotropy with the probabilistic Mendelian randomization in transcriptome-wide association studies 97%
- A novel Mendelian randomization method identifies causal relationships between gene expression and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. 97%
- Simultaneous estimation of bi-directional causal effects and heritable confounding from GWAS summary statistics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MR Corge: Sensitivity analysis of Mendelian randomization based on the core gene hypothesis for polygenic exposures 96%
- Summary statistics from large-scale gene-environment interaction studies for re-analysis and meta-analysis 96%
- Incorporating family disease history and controlling case-control imbalance for population based genetic association studies 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.