The geography of the Anthropocene differs between the land and the sea
Bowler, D.; Bjorkmann, A.; Dornelas, M.; Myers-Smith, I.; Navarro, L.; Niamir, A.; Supp, S.; Waldock, C.; Vellend, M.; Blowes, S.; Boehning-Gaese, K.; Bruelheide, H.; Elahi, R.; Antao, L.; Hines, J.; Isbell, F.; Jones, H.; Magurran, A.; Cabral, J.; Winter, M.; Bates, A.
Show abstract
O_LIClimate change and other anthropogenic drivers of biodiversity change are unequally distributed across the world. The geographic patterns of different drivers, and the spatial overlap among these drivers, have important implications for the direction and pace of biodiversity change, yet are not well documented. Moreover, it is unknown if the geographic patterns of drivers differ between the terrestrial and marine realm, as expected due to marked differences in how humans interact with the land and ocean. C_LIO_LIWe compiled global gridded datasets on climate change, land-use, resource exploitation, pollution, species invasions, and human population density. We used multivariate statistics to examine the spatial relationships among the datasets and to characterize the typical combinations of drivers experienced by different parts of the world. C_LIO_LIWe found stronger positive correlations among drivers in the terrestrial than in the marine realm, leading to areas of high intensities of multiple drivers on land. Climate change tended to be negatively correlated with other drivers in the terrestrial realm (e.g., in the tundra and boreal forest with high climate change but low human use and pollution) whereas the opposite was true in the marine realm (e.g., in the Indo-Pacific with high climate change and high fishing). C_LIO_LIWe show that different regions of the world can be defined by anthropogenic threat complexes (ATCs), distinguished by different sets of drivers with varying intensities. The ATCs can be used to test hypothesis about the pattern of biodiversity change, especially the joint effects of multiple drivers. More generally, our global analysis highlights the broad conservation priorities needed to mitigate the effects of anthropogenic change on biodiversity responses, with different priorities emerging on land and in the ocean, and in different parts of the world. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hard-to-sample species are more sensitive to land-use change: implications for global biodiversity metrics 95%
- Megafauna diversity and functional declines in Europe from the Last Interglacial (LIG) to the present 94%
- Future climate and land use change will equally impact global terrestrial vertebrate diversity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Landscape functional connectivity for butterflies under different scenarios of land-use, land-cover, and climate change in Australia 93%
- An expert-based global assessment of threats and conservation measures for subterranean ecosystems 91%
- The role of elections as drivers of tropical deforestation 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.