Back

Intrahost speciations and host switches shaped the evolution of herpesviruses

Brito, A. F.; Pinney, J. W.

2020-05-17 evolutionary biology
10.1101/418111 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cospeciation has been suggested to be the main force driving the evolution of herpesviruses, with viral species co-diverging with their hosts along more than 400 million years of evolutionary history. Recent studies, however, have been challenging this assumption, showing that other co-phylogenetic events, such as intrahost speciations and host switches play a central role on their evolution. Most of these studies, however, were performed with undated phylogenies, which may underestimate or overestimate the frequency of certain events. In this study we performed co-phylogenetic analyses using time-calibrated trees of herpesviruses and their hosts. This approach allowed us to (i) infer co-phylogenetic events over time, and (ii) integrate crucial information about continental drift and host biogeography to better understand virus-host evolution. We observed that cospeciations were in fact relatively rare events, taking place mostly after the Late Cretaceous (~100 Millions of years ago). Host switches were particularly common among alphaherpesviruses, where at least 10 transfers were detected. Among beta- and gammaherpesviruses, transfers were less frequent, with intrahost speciations followed by losses playing more prominent roles, especially from the Early Jurassic to the Early Cretaceous, when those viral lineages underwent several intrahost speciations. Our study reinforces the understanding that cospeciations are uncommon events in herpesvirus evolution. More than topological incongruences, mismatches in divergence times were the main disagreements between host and viral phylogenies. In most cases, host switches could not explain such disparities, highlighting the important role of losses and intrahost speciations in the evolution of herpesviruses.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.0%
2
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
5
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.4%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
10
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
14
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
20
Archives of Virology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
23
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
25
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
26
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
28
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%