Back

Genetic Determinants of Cortical Structure (Thickness, Surface Area and Volumes) among Disease Free Adults in the CHARGE Consortium

Hofer, E.; Roshchupkin, G. V.; Adams, H.; Knol, M.; Lin, H.; Li, S.; Zare, H.; Ahmad, S.; Armstrong, N.; Satizabal, C.; Bernard, M.; Bis, J.; Gillespie, N.; Luciano, M.; Mishra, A.; Scholz, M.; Teumer, A.; Xia, R.; Jian, X.; Mosley, T.; Saba, Y.; Pirpamer, L.; Seiler, S.; Becker, J.; Carmichael, O.; Rotter, J.; Psaty, B.; Lopez, O.; Amin, N.; Lee, S.; Yang, Q.; Himali, J.; Maillard, P.; Beiser, A.; DeCarli, C.; Karama, S.; Lewis, L.; Bastin, M.; Harris, M.; Deary, I.; Witte, V.; Beyer, F.; Loeffler, M.; Mather, K.; Schofield, P.; Thalamuthu, A.; Kwok, J.; Wright, M.; Ames, D.; Trollor, J.; Jia

2019-06-19 genetics
10.1101/409649 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cortical thickness, surface area and volumes (MRI cortical measures) vary with age and cognitive function, and in neurological and psychiatric diseases. We examined heritability, genetic correlations and genome-wide associations of cortical measures across the whole cortex, and in 34 anatomically predefined regions. Our discovery sample comprised 22,822 individuals from 20 cohorts within the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) consortium and the United Kingdom Biobank. Significant associations were replicated in the Enhancing Neuroimaging Genetics through Meta-analysis (ENIGMA) consortium, and their biological implications explored using bioinformatic annotation and pathway analyses. We identified genetic heterogeneity between cortical measures and brain regions, and 161 genome-wide significant associations pointing to wnt/{beta}-catenin, TGF-{beta} and sonic hedgehog pathways. There was enrichment for genes involved in anthropometric traits, hindbrain development, vascular and neurodegenerative disease and psychiatric conditions. These data are a rich resource for studies of the biological mechanisms behind cortical development and aging.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.