Molecular flexibility of DNA as a key determinant of RAD51 recruitment
Paoletti, F.; El-Sagheer, A.; Allard, J.; Brown, T.; Dushek, O.; Esashi, F.
Show abstract
The timely activation of homologous recombination is essential for the maintenance of genome stability, in which the RAD51 recombinase plays a central role. Biochemically, human RAD51 polymerises faster on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) compared to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), raising a key conceptual question: how does it discriminate between them? In this study, we tackled this problem by systematically assessing RAD51 binding kinetics on ssDNA and dsDNA differing in length and flexibility using surface plasmon resonance. By fitting detailed polymerisation models informed by our experimental datasets, we show that RAD51 is a mechano-sensor that exhibits a larger polymerisation rate constant on flexible ssDNA compared to rigid ssDNA or dsDNA. This model presents a new general framework suggesting that the flexibility of DNA, which may increase locally as a result of DNA damage, plays an important role in rapidly recruiting repair factors that multimerise at sites of DNA damage.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-molecule view of coordination in a multi-functional DNA polymerase 96%
- Non-Denaturing Bisulfite Treatment And Single-Molecule Real-Time Sequencing Reveals D-Loop Footprints, Their Length, Position And Distribution 96%
- Distinct architectural requirements for the parS centromeric sequence of the pSM19035 plasmid partition machinery 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modulation of archaeal hypernucleosome structure and stability by Mg2+ 95%
- Rapid long-distance migration of RPA on single stranded DNA occurs through intersegmental transfer utilizing multivalent interactions 95%
- How Glutamate Promotes Liquid-liquid Phase Separation and DNA Binding Cooperativity of E. coli SSB Protein 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.