Back

Spatial distribution of private gene mutations in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Moore, A. L.; Batavia, A. A.; Kuipers, J.; Singer, J.; Burcklen, E.; Schraml, P.; Beisel, C.; Moch, H.; Beerenwinkel, N.

2021-04-26 cancer biology
10.1101/305623 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intra-tumour heterogeneity is the molecular hallmark of renal cancer, and the molecular tumour composition determines the treatment outcome of renal cancer patients. In renal cancer tumourigenesis, in general, different tumour clones evolve over time. We analysed intra-tumour heterogeneity and subclonal mutation patterns in 178 tumour samples obtained from 89 clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients. In an initial discovery phase, whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing data from paired tumour biopsies from 16 ccRCC patients were used to design a gene panel for follow-up analysis. In this second phase, 826 selected genes were targeted at deep coverage in an extended cohort of 89 patients for a detailed analysis of tumour heterogeneity. On average, we found 22 mutations per patient. Pairwise comparison of the two biopsies from the same tumour revealed that on average 62% of the mutations in a patient were detected in one of the two samples. In addition to commonly mutated genes (VHL, PBRM1, SETD2 and BAP1), frequent subclonal mutations with low variant allele frequency (<10%) were observed in TP53 and in mucin coding genes MUC6, MUC16, and MUC3A. Of the 89 ccRCC tumours, 87 (~98%) harboured private mutations, occurring in only one of the paired tumour samples. Clonally exclusive pathway pairs were identified using the WES data set from 16 ccRCC patients. Our findings imply that shared and private mutations significantly contribute to the complexity of differential gene expression and pathway interaction, and might explain clonal evolution of different molecular renal cancer subgroups. Multi-regional sequencing is central for the identification of subclones within ccRCC.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NAR Cancer
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
3
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
5
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
6
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.6%
10
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
11
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
16
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
19
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
22
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
29
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%