Longitudinal changes in gut microbiota across reproductive states in wild baboons
Southworth, C. A.; Barrios, L.; Dasari, M. D.; Gesquiere, L. R.; Gilbert, J. A.; Alberts, S. C.; Tung, J.; Archie, E. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn humans and other mammals, female reproduction is linked to extensive changes in physiology, immunity, hormones, and behavior. These changes likely shape, and may be shaped by, the composition of gut microbial communities. Characterizing the dynamics of gut microbial change across reproductive states, including its relationship to female physiology, is important for understanding how the gut microbiota influences female and offspring health. ResultsHere we characterize longitudinal changes in gut microbiota across reproduction by combining 16S rRNA gene sequencing data from 4,462 stool samples (spanning 14 years of sample collection) with life history data on multiple reproductive events in 169 female baboons. These baboons were members of a well-studied, natural baboon population in Kenya where reproductive state (ovarian cycling, pregnancy, and postpartum amenorrhea) is tracked daily and microbiota data could be paired with measurements of fecal-derived estrogen, progesterone, and glucocorticoid levels. We found extensive changes in baboon gut microbiota as females transitioned between reproductive states. Pregnancy was linked to distinct patterns of ASV richness, community composition, and taxonomic abundances compared to postpartum amenorrhea and ovarian cycling. The most dramatic shifts occurred as females transitioned from the first to second trimester of pregnancy, with altered abundances of taxa that have been linked, in humans and model systems, to host immunity, weight gain, or hormone levels. Host identity was consistently the strongest predictor of gut microbiota composition across states, and this individual signature was strongest during pregnancy. Estrogen and progesterone levels had robust associations with the gut microbiota overall, but the microbial taxa involved in these associations are reproductive state-dependent. Glucocorticoid concentrations were not a major predictor of gut microbiota composition in any state. ConclusionsTogether, our results support the idea that gut microbiota contribute to the complex physiological changes necessary during pregnancy, but that microbial changes during pregnancy are somewhat unique to each female. Variation in steroid hormones drives some, but not all, of these relationships, emphasizing the importance of considering steroid hormone levels in studies of gut microbiota variation. Our results motivate future work on how gut microbiota contribute to reproductive outcomes, including both maternal and offspring health.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Sub-communities of the vaginal ecosystem in pregnant and non-pregnant women. 95%
- Mating changes the genital microbiome in both sexes of the common bedbug Cimex lectularius across populations 92%
- Testing frameworks for early life effects: the developmental constraints and adaptive responsehypotheses do not explain key fertility outcomes in wild female baboons 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gut microbiome shifts with urbanization and potentially facilitates a zoonotic pathogen in a wading bird 93%
- The rodent vaginal microbiome across the estrous cycle and the effect of genital nerve electrical stimulation 93%
- Long-read sequencing to interrogate strain-level variation among adherent-invasive Escherichia coli isolated from human intestinal tissue 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of an IgE receptor polymorphism acting on immunity, susceptibility to infection and reproduction in a wild rodent 92%
- Representation of male features in the female mouse Accessory Olfactory Bulb, and their stability during the estrus cycle 92%
- Multi-omics analyses and machine learning prediction of oviductal responses in the presence of gametes and embryos 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.