Back

In situ GCIB Cryo-Sectioning Enables Subcellular Cryo-ToF-SIMS Imaging of Arabidopsis Seeds

Claire, S.; Moreau, B.; Boujard, M.; Eric, G.; Jouneau, P.-H.; Barnes, J.-P.

2025-11-29 plant biology
10.1101/2025.11.28.691143 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) enables label-free molecular imaging at submicrometric resolution, but its application to biological samples remains limited due to sample preparation challenges. Conventional fixation or dehydration alters morphology and induces analyte relocation, while cryo-transfer systems are costly and technically demanding. We present an in situ cryo-etching approach using a gas cluster ion beam (GCIB) and a new sample holder with a flat titanium ridge mask, enabling the sectioning of frozen specimens directly inside the ToF-SIMS instrument. Using Arabidopsis thaliana seeds as a model, this method produced flat, artefact-free surfaces suitable for subcellular imaging without chemical treatment or cryo-transfer. Mass spectra showed intact molecular profiles up to 1000 Da, and ToF-SIMS ion maps revealed preserved tissue architecture and distinct subcellular compartments at a resolution of [~]1 {micro}m. Compared to air-dried cryosections, cryo-etching eliminated structural collapse and analyte delocalization. This workflow provides a practical and accessible route for cryo-ToF-SIMS analysis of hydrated biological materials, combining structural fidelity with molecular integrity. It offers a simple alternative to conventional cryo-transfer methods for high-resolution chemical imaging.

Published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (predicted rank #14) · training set

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
● 218 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Journal of Structural Biology
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
5
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Analytica Chimica Acta
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.3%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.2%
9
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Talanta
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Journal of the American Chemical Society
● 217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
PROTEOMICS
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · published here
● 37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
The Analyst
● 16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
● 36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.4%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
ACS Nano
● 113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
● 63 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Journal of Visualized Experiments
● 34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Nanoscale Advances
● 15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Advanced Biology
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
The Plant Journal
○ 215 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
28
Developmental Dynamics
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
29
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
New Phytologist
○ 346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.