Back

From microbiome to sperm motility traits: An inside out perspective

Graziano, M.; Garbini, G. L.; Devigili, A.; Pinzoni, L.; Quagliariello, A.; Bosi, E.; Gasparini, C.; Fondi, M.; Martino, M. E.

2025-11-28 microbiology
10.1101/2025.11.28.691116 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Growing interest in the relationship between microbiome composition and host biology has revealed the many ways host-associated microbes influence physiology, ecology, and evolution. However, microbial communities associated with reproductive organs - and their roles in reproduction - remain poorly understood. Here, we characterized the skin- and ejaculate-associated microbiomes in an internally fertilizing fish and tested whether microbial diversity and specific bacterial taxa correlate with sperm motility traits key for reproductive success. We used the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a well-established model in ecology and evolutionary biology with well-characterised reproductive physiology. In guppies, sperm velocity is a validated predictor of male reproductive performance, making them a powerful system for exploring microbiome-fertility interactions. Our analyses reveal a correlation between skin microbiome diversity and sperm performance. Notably, increased skin microbiome total richness is associated with reduced sperm velocity, whereas no significant associations were detected for ejaculate-associated microbiomes. We also identified bacterial taxa across both tissues that were positively or negatively linked with sperm performance. These findings suggest that, while the ejaculate-associated microbiome may directly influence sperm traits, the skin microbiome could serve as a proxy for reproductive potential by reflecting systemic physiological and immunological states associated with fertility.

Published in Biology Letters · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.