Mode of Birth and Adherence to WHO Physical Activity Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Study of Danish Postpartum Mothers
Dammand, M. G.; Bueno, S. V.; Skejoe, S. D.
Show abstract
AimThe objective of this paper is to investigate if the prevalence proportion ratio of non-adherence to the World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines of at least 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per week differed among Danish mothers based on mode of birth. We hypothesised that women who gave birth via caesarean section adhere less to the WHOs recommendations compared with women who gave birth vaginally. MethodThis population-based cross-sectional study is based on data from 1,919 Danish mothers participating in the Danish National Health Survey from 2021 and the Danish Medical Birth Register. Mode of birth was dichotomised into either caesarean section or vaginal birth based on diagnostic codes in the Danish Medical Birth Register. Physical activity measured as weekly minutes of MVPA based on the self-reported physical activity in the Danish National Health Survey. Based on the answers of the survey, the mothers were dichotomised into two groups: adherers to the WHO guidelines of PA and non-adherers to the WHO guidelines of PA. The prevalence proportion of non-adherence to WHO guidelines was compared between the two modes of birth. FindingsThe prevalence proportion of non-adherence was 2% lower among mothers who gave birth via caesarean section compared with mothers who gave birth vaginally, but with a 95% confidence interval ([0.90; 1.06]) indicating a statistically non-significant difference. ConclusionThis study found no statistically significant difference in non-adherence to the WHO PA guidelines between mothers who gave birth via caesarean section and mothers who gave birth vaginally.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationships between children’s motor competence, physical activity, perceived motor competence, physical fitness and weight status in relation to age 95%
- A Mental Health Paradox: Mental health was both a motivator and barrier to physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- The association between caesarean section delivery and later life obesity in 21-24 year olds in an Urban South African birth cohort 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Weighting of risk factors for low birth weight: A linked routine data cohort study in Wales, UK 93%
- Taking a participatory research approach within workplace health promotion research to improve physical activity levels in office-based workers: a scoping review protocol 93%
- Prevalence Of Abdominal Obesity And Its Association With Cardiovascular Risk Among The Adult Population In Burkina Faso 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Cross-Sectional Survey Of Australian Women'S Perspectives And Experiences Of Exercise During Pregnancy, Including Women That Experience Mental Illness 94%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 94%
- Monitoring One Heart to Help Two: Heart Rate Variability and Resting Heart Rate using Wearable Technology in Active Women Across the Perinatal Period 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gynaecological health patterns and motherhood experiences of female professional football players 94%
- Relationship between early childhood non-parental childcare and diet, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep: A systematic review of longitudinal studies 92%
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal trends of key preconception indicators among women in Northern Ireland, UK: An analysis of maternity healthcare data 2011-2021 92%
- Type of treatment matters for the association between conception through medically assisted reproduction and childhood cognition: A Danish population-wide cohort study 89%
- “Social distancing: barriers to its implementation and how they can be overcome – a rapid systematic review” 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.