Back

Developmental Trajectories of Addition and Subtraction in Early School-aged Children

Zhou, M.; Ji, S.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, H.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Mei, H.; Kuang, R.; Lin, Y.; Song, Y.; Huang, J.; Dong, X.

2025-11-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.11.27.691071 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mastering basic arithmetic lays the foundation for lifelong mathematical achievement, yet how the neural mechanisms underlying addition and subtraction calculations develop during childhood remain unclear. This study investigated the developmental trajectories of addition and subtraction calculations in school-aged children, and explored how arithmetic-specific neural responses in the right parieto-occipital region are related to age-related improvements in behavioral performance. Here, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) signals from 115 typically developing children divided into three age groups (7-8-, 9-10-, and 11-12-year-olds) during an arithmetic task involving addition and subtraction calculations. We analyzed the P300 component from the original waveforms and the {Delta}P300 component from the difference waveforms, which were generated by subtracting the event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by the first operand from those elicited by the second operand to isolate arithmetic-specific neural processes. The results revealed that, in both calculations, older children showed better behavioral performance (faster reaction time and larger PI) and greater right parieto-occipital {Delta}P300 amplitudes, with a key developmental stage at 11-12 years. Furthermore, all groups of children exhibited greater right parieto-occipital P300 and {Delta}P300 amplitudes in subtraction, whereas the smaller right parieto-occipital {Delta}P300 amplitudes in addition significantly mediated the relationship between age and PI. These findings reveal distinct patterns for addition and subtraction calculations over development, highlighting the right parieto-occipital {Delta}P300 amplitude as a neural marker of arithmetic performance, particularly for addition calculation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.