Back

Resolving phenotyping discordance with SPACEMAP, an integrated machine learning framework

Dawod, B.; Rodriguez, A. P.; Diegeler, S.; Elghonaimy, E. A.; Wachsman, M.; Gopal, P.; Hein, D.; Acosta, P.; Jamieson, A.; Danuser, G.; Timmerman, R. D.; Rajaram, S.; Aguilera, T. A.

2025-12-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.11.27.690631 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiplex imaging technologies have revolutionized our ability to study cellular behavior within the tissue microenvironment. Translating this complex data into meaningful biological insights requires a unified analytical framework. To address this, we developed SPACEMAP (Spatial Phenotyping And Classification with Enhanced Multiplex Analysis Pipeline), a comprehensive Python and Qupath-based platform for multiplex imaging analysis. SPACEMAP integrates image registration, segmentation, artifact removal, tissue and zone classification, spatial feature extraction, and a consolidated phenotyping approach into a single system. A core feature of SPACEMAP is its high-fidelity phenotyping. To evaluate classification performance, we benchmarked our method RESOLVE, against three established approaches, Leiden clustering, Self-Organizing Maps, and SCIMAP revealing substantial disagreement among them. SPACEMAP overcomes this through two complementary workflows: a machine learning model trained on expert-labeled cells, and a consensus classifier that integrates high-confidence cells across methods. Here, we validated SPACEMAP on in-house colorectal cancer samples and a public dataset, demonstrating its robustness.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
2
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.3%
3
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.1%
4
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.3%
6
Cytometry Part A
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
BMC Methods
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
11
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
12
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
13
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 17%
2.1%
15
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
17
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.1%
21
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
26
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
28
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.6%
30
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%