Back

Bench-to-bedside translation of Self-Healing colloidal hydrogels as 2nd generation design of Flowable Hemostatic Matrix: From Preclinical evaluation to Human Clinical Trials

Feng, G.; Chen, K.; Ying, Q.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Li, G.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, B.; Wang, H.; Li, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Ren, C.; Chen, B.; Sun, Y.

2025-11-28 surgery
10.1101/2025.11.27.25338626 medRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of self-healing materials has brought a paradigm shift in the design of functional biomedical devices for applications such as drug delivery, tissue regeneration, and 3D bioprinting. However, their clinical translation remains limited due to challenges including insufficient mechanical strength, potentially cytotoxic chemical modifications, and complex healing activation conditions. Herein, we present the development of self-healing colloidal gelatin hydrogel as an innovative design of flowable hemostatic matrix, and successfully demonstrate its bench-to-bedside translation into a biomedical device (named as Colloidose(R)). Specifically, amphoteric gelatin submicron particles self-assemble into an integrated gel network exhibiting a high storage modulus (G> 15 kPa) and a healing efficiency exceeding 95%, enabling rapid in situ solidification to accelerate blood clot formation. By comparing with more conventional design strategy flowable gelatin matrix based on dispersion of hundreds micrometer-sized gelatin granules, we demonstrate that Colloidose(R) are more effective for hemostasis in anatomically challenging or pressure-intolerant sites such as hepatobiliary surgery, otorhinolaryngology, and gynecology based on comprehensive preclinical animal studies and over 300 clinical cases. Overall, Colloidose(R) exemplifies the successful clinical translation of an advanced self-healing biomaterial, establishing its role as a 2nd generation flowable hemostatic matrix and opening new avenues for the development of injectable and moldable biomedical devices.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.