Back

The bind of the burrow: space use is dominated by selection for burrow habitat over foraging habitat in an arid-adapted carnivore

Thorley, J.; Duncan, C.; Herdtle, A.; Manser, M.; Cram, D.; Clutton-Brock, T.

2025-11-29 ecology
10.1101/2025.11.26.690549 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Our understanding of habitat selection in wild vertebrates has been heavily influenced by observations of preferred foraging areas. However, foraging is only one of many ways animals interact with their environment, and preferences for habitat features that support resting, breeding, and safety, along with trade-offs between these needs, remain underexplored. These trade-offs are likely to be particularly acute in complex environments where these needs are met in different locations. Using a long-term dataset of movements and life history, we examine how preferences for foraging areas and burrow sites shape space use in Kalahari meerkats (Suricata suricatta). Meerkats cannot dig new sleeping and breeding burrows and must use those abandoned by other species, potentially generating trade-offs in daily space use if overnight refuges are far from optimal foraging areas. We find that space use is strongly anchored by burrow location, with burrows in calcareous pans and dry riverbed ("white sand") habitat being preferred year-round and showing lower burrow switching rates. However, white sand areas were not preferred for foraging, and yielded lower weight gains, particularly during the dry season. As a result, meerkats faced a trade-off between optimal burrow locations and productive foraging grounds, as indicated by faster, longer, and more energetically costly travel when moving through or waking up in white sands. Our results suggest that changes in the distribution or abundance of key burrow-constructing species in desert environments may have cascading effects on the many secondary burrow-using species that depend on them for survival and reproduction. More broadly, our results highlight that limited refuge availability across the landscape can impose strong ecological constraints on animals and may restrict behavioural plasticity under environmental change, particularly if productive foraging areas shift.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
3
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
6
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
9
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
13
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
14
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.7%
17
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
20
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
22
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
24
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
29
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%