Combining artificial intelligence and local ecological knowledge to document the largest ever-counted Cape buffalo mega-herd
Bennitt, E.; Costelloe, B. R.; Koger, B.; Wielgus, E.; Masunga, G.; Caron, A.
Show abstract
Large aggregations of wild mammals are declining globally, sometimes before they can be scientifically documented and their ecological value understood, although non-scientists may be aware of these phenomena. Video recording of wildlife by non-academics is becoming more frequent with increasing activities of humans in natural habitats. This opportunistically-collected material can document rare or ecologically-important events, such as large aggregations, and thus provide potentially valuable data for ecologists and conservationists. We used footage of a large herd of Cape buffalo recorded by a wildlife film producer in the Mababe Depression, northern Botswana, and applied automated detection and tracking techniques to count individuals as they moved across the video frame. To complement this demographic snapshot, we accessed local ecological knowledge from stakeholders to provide contextual information for a more complete understanding of the ecosystem processes potentially driving population movement and trends. Manual review of the automated count resulted in a minimum group size of 3676 buffalo and a total estimated herd size of 4131 (range 3828-4446), which matched herd size estimates provided by local stakeholders. To our knowledge, this is the largest documented group of Cape buffalo, which we identify as a mega-herd and recommend research into the costs, benefits and ecological consequences of forming such large groups. This study represents an opportunistic collaboration among wildlife filmmakers, computer scientists, lay experts and ecologists, and highlights the value of combining contributions from different fields to generate information that can be used in conservation practice.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Annotating opportunistic camera-trap images with conditions ofrecording, for the disease surveillance of Eurasian lynx (Lynxlynx) 94%
- Operational lessons learned from simulating an elimination response to a transboundary animal disease in wild animals 93%
- Towards risk-based surveillance of African Swine Fever in Switzerland 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the deathbed of ASF-infected wild boars in South Korea using 2019-2020 national surveillance data 93%
- Impact evaluation of score classes and annotation regions in deep learning-based dairy cow body condition prediction 91%
- ClassifyMe: a field-scouting software for the identification of wildlife in camera trap images. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A framework for linking hemispheric, full annual cycle prioritizations to local conservation actions for migratory birds 92%
- Predicting feral cat-reduction targets and costs on large islands using stochastic population models 92%
- Estimating home range and temporal space use variability reveals age-related differences in risk exposure for reintroduced parrots 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How do King Cobras move across a major highway? Unintentional wildlife crossing structures may facilitate movement. 94%
- Improving the accessibility and transferability of machine learning algorithms for identification of animals in camera trap images: MLWIC2 94%
- Too few, too many, or just right? Optimizing sample sizes for population-level inferences in animal tracking projects 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Boosting biodiversity monitoring using smartphone-driven, rapidly accumulating community-sourced data 92%
- Different coexistence patterns between apex carnivores and mesocarnivores based on temporal, spatial, and dietary niche partitioning analysis in Qilian Mountain National Park, China 92%
- The value of livestock abortion surveillance in Tanzania: identifying disease priorities and informing interventions 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.