Cross-Program Secondary Analyses and Public Health Innovation: The RADx Data Hub as a Resource for Integrated COVID-19 Research
Smith, K.; Rose, P. W.; Rivas, T.; Mehri, N.; Alonso Lozoya, O.; Jeffers-Francis, L.; King, M. D.; Akdogan, M. U.; Snipe, J.; Farlow, B.; Keller, M. A.; Musen, M. A.; Suber, S.; Krishnamurthy, A.
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for timely, standardized research data to address future health challenges. From the pandemic, there has been a plethora of diverse data, including patient demographics, clinical outcomes, biospecimen information, and technology development frameworks. Yet, much of these data have been fragmented and without clear provenance and standardization. To overcome these limitations, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) established the RADx Data Hub (Data Hub) as a centralized platform to promote Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics (RADx) data distribution under the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) data principles. The Data Hub aggregated diverse COVID-19 diagnostic and clinical datasets into a harmonized repository that supports data integration, quality control, and secondary research. We independently tested Data Hub biomedical data management and data analysis capabilities to investigate its utility in viral monitoring, health disparity research, biomarker identification, and precarity modeling. We found that the Data Hubs accessibility enabled efficient secondary research, including diagnostic and clinical data reuse. This supports repository use in accelerating infectious disease research and studying disease outcomes. Further, the Data Hubs centralized, FAIR-aligned structure exemplifies a sustainable data stewardship model, extending beyond COVID-19 to addressing future public health emergencies, while strengthening the capacity to do reproducible science within broader biomedical research.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R) Study: Study Design 94%
- Human Epidemiology and RespOnse to SARS-CoV-2 (HEROS): Objectives, Design and Enrollment Results of a 12-City Remote Observational Surveillance Study of Households with Children using Direct-to-Participant Methods 93%
- Waning of two-dose BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is robust to depletion-of-susceptibles bias 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of sewer connectivity in the United States and its implications for equity in wastewater-based epidemiology 92%
- Diagnostic testing preferences can help inform future public health response efforts: global insights from an international survey 91%
- Architecture of systems affecting disease trajectories in a conflict zone: A community-centered systems inquiry in North Gaza 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of Volumetric Absorptive Micro Sampling to Measure Multidimensional Anti-Influenza Hemagglutinin IgG Antibodies by mPlex-Flu Assay 89%
- Precision risk assessment for pediatric hospitalization using address-level data in Cincinnati, Ohio 89%
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility and lessons learned on remote trial implementation from TestBoston, a fully remote, longitudinal, large-scale COVID-19 surveillance study 95%
- Development of at-home sample collection logistics for large scale SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies 94%
- Reduced turnaround times through multi-sectoral collaboration during the first surge of SARS-CoV-2 in Louisiana, March-April 2020 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted Hybridization Capture of SARS-CoV-2 and Metagenomics Enables Genetic Variant Discovery and Nasal Microbiome Insights 93%
- UltraSEQ: a universal bioinformatic platform for information-based clinical metagenomics and beyond 92%
- Post-vaccination SARS-COV-2 among healthcare workers in New Jersey: a genomic epidemiological study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.