Full BLOOD count TRends for colorectal cAnCer deteCtion (BLOODTRACC): external validation of colorectal cancer prediction models in English primary care
Virdee, P. S.; Birks, J.; Holt, T.; Snell, K. I. E.; Abel, G.; Nicholson, B. D.
Show abstract
IntroductionColorectal cancer has low survival rates when diagnosed late-stage. We previously developed sex-specific dynamic risk prediction models utilising trends in the full blood count (FBC), a blood test commonly performed in primary care, to support early detection. We aimed to externally validate these prediction models. MethodsWe performed a hybrid case-control and cohort study of patients with at least one FBC test. We first excluded FBCs within two years before diagnosis (cases) or study exit (controls) and selected the most recent FBC as the baseline test per patient from the resulting data. Patients were aged at least 40 years at baseline and had no history of colorectal cancer. The models included age (years) at baseline and simultaneous trends over historical haemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and platelet measurements measured over five years before baseline to inform two-year risk of colorectal cancer diagnosis. Performance measures included the c-statistic and calibration slope. ResultsWe included 2,956,977 males and 3,561,349 females, with 0.4% (n=12,578) and 0.3% (n=11,939) diagnosed with colorectal cancer, respectively. The c-statistic (95% CI) was 0.73 (0.72-0.73) for males and 0.74 (0.74-0.75) for females. The calibration slope (95% CI) was 0.92 (0.89-0.94) for males and 0.95 (0.93-0.98) for females. Calibration was good in subgroups of patient data, except under-predicted risk in those aged 70+ years, White individuals, and those with higher IMD. The c-statistic (95% CI) was similar regardless of the number of FBCs used to define trend and increased as the longitudinal trend window increased until around 2.5-3.0 years for men (0.73 (0.71-0.74)) and 3.0-3.5 years for women (0.73 (0.72-0.75)) and decreased with increasing longitudinal windows thereafter. ConclusionUtilising temporal changes in the FBC test could enhance risk stratification for colorectal cancer. Further research may highlight approaches for improving predictive performance further.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ability of known colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk: A cohort study within the UK Biobank 95%
- Predicting Clinical Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection During the Omicron Wave Using Machine Learning 92%
- The impact of worldwide, national and sub-national severity distributions in Burden of Disease studies: a case study of individual cancer types in Scotland 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations with Stages of Colorectal Carcinogenesis 92%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 92%
- Impact of Screening and Follow-up Colonoscopy Adenoma Sensitivity on Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the CRC-AIM Microsimulation Model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 94%
- Identification of patients at risk for pancreatic cancer in a 3-year timeframe based on machine learning algorithms 94%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- CA125 and age-based models for ovarian cancer detection in primary care: a population-based external validation study 94%
- Cost-effectiveness of CA125- and age-informed risk-based triage for ovarian cancer detection in primary care 94%
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 93%
- Genetically-proxied therapeutic inhibition of antihypertensive drug targets and risk of common cancers 92%
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning-based Prognostic Models for Acute Pancreatitis: Towards Improving Methods and Reporting Quality 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.