Back

Transcriptional response to chronic long-access fentanyl self-administration in rat habenula and amygdala

Magnard, R.; Gonzalez-Padilla, D.; Yalcinbas, E. A.; Chaloux-Pinette, E.; Eagles, N. J.; Totty, M. S.; Janak, P. H.; Collado-Torres, L.; Maynard, K. R.

2025-11-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.11.25.690517 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid associated with overdose. However, little is known about fentanyl-induced molecular adaptations in the habenula and amygdala, two brain regions implicated in opioid use and withdrawal. We performed bulk RNA-sequencing in the rat habenula and amygdala to identify transcriptomic changes associated with fentanyl intake. Rats self-administered intravenous saline or fentanyl over 22-24 days. Ninety minutes following the final session, brains were collected for transcriptomic profiling. In Hb, we identified 453 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between saline and fentanyl rats, with upregulated genes associated with synaptic transmission and ionic conductance. In amygdala, we identified 3,041 fentanyl-associated DEGs with upregulated genes implicated in metabolic and vesicular functions. Downregulated genes in both regions were enriched for extracellular matrix functions. Integration of DEGs with single-cell RNA-sequencing data from rodents and humans revealed that fentanyl DEGs were enriched in specific habenula and amygdala cell type markers. Furthermore, fentanyl downregulated DEGs in amygdala were enriched in genes associated with risk for substance use disorders. Together, we define how fentanyl intake alters transcriptional programs in the rat habenula and amygdala, and we link these changes to specific human cell types and risk genes for neuropsychiatric disorders and addiction.

Published in Addiction Biology (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.