PKU tags, novel genetically encoded shape tags for cell labeling in light and electron microscopy
Sun, R.; Yang, P.; Wang, L.; Hu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Deng, F.; Li, S.; Fan, M.; Xia, X.; Li, Y.
Show abstract
Distinguishing among neuronal cell types is crucial for deciphering complex neural networks and brain functions. However, the current repertoire of cell-labeling tools compatible with light microscopy (LM) and/or electron microscopy (EM) is limited compared to the vast number of cell types in the brain. Here, we introduce PKU (polymer king-size unit) tags, genetically encoded "shape tags" that leverage the polymerization of self-assembling proteins, spectrally distinct fluorescent proteins and, optionally, a nuclear targeting sequence to generate a series of multi-shaped (spherical or filamentous), multi-colored (blue, green, red, near-infrared) and multi-localized (cytosolic or nuclear) tags. By co-expressing multiple PKU tags within the same cell, a combinatorial strategy further expands the repertoire, which can theoretically yield hundreds of unique labeling patterns. Expressing PKU tags in vivo provides multi-cell-type labeling and neuronal circuit tracing, without altering the animals behavior or transcriptomic profiles. Moreover, when fused to the peroxidase APEX2, PKU tags maintain their shape-specific features, providing shape "barcoding" using EM. Thus, PKU tags represent a versatile and efficient toolkit for studying connectomics using both LM and EM.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep-tissue spatial omics: imaging whole-embryo transcriptomics and subcellular structures at high spatial resolution 96%
- Correlative three-dimensional super-resolution and block face electron microscopy of whole vitreously frozen cells 96%
- Dense Functional and Molecular Readout of a Circuit Hub in Sensory Cortex 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.