Calibration of MRI-based reference intervals to new samples
Chen, A. A.; Seidlitz, J.; Gardner, M.; Bethlehem, R. A. I.; Dorfschmidt, L.; Kafadar, E.; Lifespan Brain Chart Consortium, ; Benitez, A.; Jensen, J. H.; Vandekar, S.; Satterthwaite, T. D.; Alexander-Bloch, A. F.
Show abstract
Reference intervals, defined as intervals containing a new observation with a specified probability relative to reference data, would be clinically useful in assessing brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Brain charts, which are estimates of MRI phenotypes across covariates such as age and sex, can be used to construct reference intervals. However, the reference data used to fit intervals often differs from a new sample in terms of study design, MRI acquisition, and image preprocessing. Application of MRI reference intervals to new samples remains a challenging problem. Here, we propose a new method called Reference interval calibration via conFormal prediction (ReForm) that adjusts reference intervals for a new sample. Our method builds on recent work in conformal prediction, which yields intervals with guaranteed coverage for new observations. Through resampling experiments in Lifespan Brain Chart Consortium cortical thickness data, we compare ReFormed reference intervals to refitting intervals, statistical harmonization methods, and model-based adjustment of intervals. Notably for patient privacy concerns, ReForm does not require sharing of reference data. Yet, our empirical results demonstrate that ReForm controls FPR similarly or better than alternative methods which require sharing reference data. Finally, we provide recommendations for practical applications of ReForm and an R package (https://github.com/andy1764/ReForm) for calibrating reference intervals using ReForm.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated quality control of T1-weighted brain MRI scans for clinical research: methods comparison and design of a quality prediction classifier 95%
- RELIEF: a structured multivariate approach for removal of latent inter-scanner effects 95%
- Stacking models of brain dynamics improves prediction of subject traits in fMRI 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DeepComBat: A Statistically Motivated, Hyperparameter-Robust, Deep Learning Approach to Harmonization of Neuroimaging Data 97%
- Cross-dataset Evaluation of Dementia Longitudinal Progression Prediction Models 95%
- SAN: mitigating spatial covariance heterogeneity in cortical thickness data collected from multiple scanners or sites 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning of dissection photographs and surface scanning for quantitative 3D neuropathology 95%
- Using normative models pre-trained on cross-sectional data to evaluate intra-individual longitudinal changes in neuroimaging data 94%
- Multi-contrast Anatomical Subcortical Structures Parcellation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.