Reconnecting food production and consumption through redesigning food systems to support healthy diets
De Clerck, C.; Desmarez, T.; Delandmeter, M.; de Faccio Carvalho, P. C.; Dumont, B.; Bindelle, J.
Show abstract
Balancing the social and environmental costs of food production with the needs of future populations in the face of climate change is the greatest challenge that agriculture is facing in the 21st century. The modification of eating habits towards more environmentally friendly and healthy diets is a key lever to meet this challenge. In 2019, the EAT-Lancet commission defined a universal guideline diet that should allow 9 billion people across the globe to eat healthily while respecting planetary boundaries. In an attempt to reconnect cropping systems to such diets, we developed an innovative approach and designed a decision-making model to assist in the planning and optimization of cropping systems. This model evaluates their ability to supply a specific food system in accordance with the diet recommended by the EAT-Lancet Commission, while comparing vegan, ovo-lacto vegetarian, and omnivorous diets and minimizing the import and export of commodities. Results show that longer and more diverse crop rotations are more likely to comply with the EAT-Lancet dietary requirements, especially if grazing animals are integrated within rotations. Integrated crop-livestock systems including temporary pasture and forage cover crops minimize the excess and deficit of all commodities (food and feed supplies), while reaching the required amount of daily calories and meeting the requirements in each food category. Crop rotations typically need to include rapeseed to provide oil for human consumption and oilseed meals for livestock, as well as a legume crop for pulses and several cereals. The model allows testing a wider range of dietary recommendations or assessing the impact of specific agro-ecological practices. It supports the design of multi-objective crop rotations aligned with dietary guidelines. By reconnecting food production and consumption following a healthy diet, the model provides practical solutions to sustain all three pillars of sustainability for future food systems.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dietary protein consumption profiles show contrasting impacts on environmental and health indicators 94%
- Residue retention promotes soil carbon accumulation in minimum tillage systems: Implications for conservation tillage 92%
- Trade of commercial potting substrates: A largely overlooked means of the long-distance dispersal of plants 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploitation of neighbouring subsoil for nutrient acquisition under annual-perennial strip intercropping systems 92%
- Tensions in tillage: Reduction in tillage intensity associates with lower wheat growth and nutritional grain quality despite enhanced soil biological indicators 92%
- Powerful flowers: Public perception of grassland aesthetics is strongly related to management and biodiversity 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Crop productivity of Central European Permaculture is within the range of organic and conventional agriculture. 95%
- Intra and inter-annual climatic conditions have stronger effect than grazing intensity on root growth of permanent grasslands 92%
- Dynamic sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model describing the effect of the macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis on rumen fermentation and methane production under in vitro continuous conditions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common Vetch: a drought tolerant, high protein neglected leguminous crop with potential as a sustainable food source. 92%
- Enviromic assembly increases accuracy and reduces costs of the genomic prediction for yield plasticity 91%
- Phenotypic Variation from Waterlogging in Multiple Perennial Ryegrass Varieties under Climate Change Conditions 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.