Back

Using Experimental Evolution to Correct Mother-Daughter Separation Defects in Brewing Yeast

Ackermann, L. M.; Ro, A.; Dunn, B.; Armstrong, J. O.; Dunham, M. J.

2025-11-26 genetics
10.1101/2025.11.25.687580 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is the workhorse of the brewing industry. Brewers have domesticated a vast array of different strains with traits that complement the beers they wish to brew. Yet, some domesticated strains also harbor traits that are undesirable. One example of an undesirable trait in brewing strains is the mother-daughter separation defect (MDSD). MDSDs are a reproductive flaw present in a widely used brewing strain, London Ale III. MDSDs cause cells to form large clusters, possibly leading to the known requirement for more headspace during London Ale III fermentations that result in a lower fermentative yield. Because MDSDs can be caused by mutations to a number of genes, targeted genetic approaches to reduce MDSDs are experimentally challenging, especially for a tetraploid strain like London Ale III. To improve MDSDs in this strain, we employed experimental evolution and passaged populations from three biological replicates for over 200 generations to generate three independent evolved strains that form fewer clusters than the ancestral strain, as seen by microscopy. To confirm these results, we used flow cytometry to measure the average size of the clusters in clones of our evolved replicates and found them to be smaller on average than the ancestor. We also qualitatively assessed the aggregation phenotype using a settling assay and found that our evolved replicates settle slower than the ancestor. Finally, we characterized the mutations in our evolved replicates using whole genome sequencing and identified increased copy numbers of chromosome 1 and chromosome 14 in all three evolved clones. The best-performing strain generated by this project is now available commercially. This project demonstrates how experimental evolution can be used to select against less desirable traits in industrial yeast strains when targeted genetic approaches present considerable challenges. Future research could implement a similar approach to improve other traits in widely used brewing and baking strains.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Yeast
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
6
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
10
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
14
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
17
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
19
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
23
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%