Back

Chinese Translation and Psychometric Testing of the Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Self-Confidence Scale

He, Z.; Yu, P.; Jia, X.; Hu, L.; Xue, Z.; Lü, Y.; Marchionni, C.

2025-11-27 nursing
10.1101/2025.11.25.25341024 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and PurposeThere is no tool in China to evaluate self-confidence in peripheral intravenous catheter insertion,this study aims to translate the Peripheral intravenous Catheter Insertion Self-Confidence Scale (PVCS) into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity among nursing students. MethodsThe translation and validation followed Brislins model, including forward translation, back-translation, synthesis, expert review, and pre-testing to develop the Chinese version (C-PVCS). A convenience sample of 205 nursing students from Tianjin and Chongqing, China, was surveyed to assess reliability and validity ResultsThe Chinese version of the PVCS (C-PVCS)comprises 15 items in two dimensions: theoretical knowledge self-confidence (5 items) and operational skills self-confidence (10 items). The scales Cronbachs coefficient was 0.979, the split-half reliability was 0.944, and the test-retest reliability was 0.985. The average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.966, and the item-level content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.875 to 1.000. Exploratory factor analysis extracted two common factors, with a cumulative variance explained of 85.839%. For confirmatory factor analysis, the structural equation model fitting indices showed that the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.077, and the chi-square/degree of freedom ratio ({chi}2/df) was 2.22. ConclusionThe C-PVCS demonstrates excellent reliability and validity, making it a suitable tool for assessing nursing students self-confidence in peripheral intravenous catheter insertion.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.