A randomized controlled trial of patient navigators for post-hospital discharge diabetic foot ulcer care: the Comprehensive Assistance and Resources for Effective Diabetic Foot Navigation (CARE-D-Foot-Nav) study protocol
Schechter, M.; Rhodes, E. C.; Shao, H.; Ahmed, S.; Colquitt, K.; Chaudhry, N. Y.; Dunlop, A. L.; Flores, J.; Garcia-Toca, M.; Javia, V.; Kalokhe, A. S.; Manoj, A.; Meadows, C.; Meriwether, N.; Sales, J. M.; Soleimanmanesh, N.; Santamarina, G.; Smith-Bankhead, N. K.; Umpierrez, G.; Ramos, C. R.; Watson, E.; Peng, L.; Fayfman, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundDiabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a leading cause of limb loss globally, and DFU-related amputation rates are increasing in the United States. Multidisciplinary care improves DFU healing and prevents amputations. This strategy encompasses 4 key pillars: optimizing glycemic control, managing wounds, treating vascular disease, and addressing infections. However, the implementation of these pillars is fraught with fragmented and delayed care impeding effective wound healing and leading to amputations. Patient navigation improves chronic disease outcomes, including diabetes, but have not been tested for DFU care. Methods/DesignThe Comprehensive Assistance and Resources for Effective Diabetic Foot Navigation (CARE-D-Foot-Nav) is a multicomponent patient navigator program tailored to address individual and structural obstacles to would healing. Adults hospitalized with a DFU (n=270) will be randomized 1:1 to receive the CARE-D-Foot-Nav intervention or usual care. The primary outcome is complete DFU healing at 20-weeks post-hospital discharge adjudicated by independent reviewers blinded to treatment assignment. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported measures and economic outcomes. DiscussionCARE-D-Foot-Nav is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate patient navigation for DFU care. If the patient navigator program improves outcomes, it could transform care delivery for people with DFUs and reduce preventable limb loss. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT07223268
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 94%
- ‘Self-Management Intervention through Lifestyle Education for Kidney health’ (the SMILE-K study): protocol for a single-blind longitudinal randomised control trial with nested pilot study 93%
- A text messaging intervention to support patients with chronic pain during prescription opioid tapering: protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mobile Phone Virtual Reality Game for Pediatric Home Burn Dressing Pain Management, a Randomized Clinical Trial 92%
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 91%
- A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A guide to examining intramuscular fat formation and its cellular origin in skeletal muscle 87%
- Application of Passive Head Motion to Generate Defined Accelerations at the Heads of Rodents 86%
- Transplantation of bioengineered lung using decellularized mouse lungs and primary human endothelial cells. 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 92%
- Pilot Feasibility Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality for Pain Management During Repeated Pediatric Laser Procedures: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial 89%
- A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial of guided self-help Behavioral Activation intervention for geriatric depression 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.