Estimating the sleep period time window based on a hip-worn accelerometer collected in children and adults
Migueles, J. H.; van Hees, V. T.; Stein, M. J.; Leitzmann, M. F.; Baurecht, H.; Lendt, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurately detecting the Sleep Period Time (SPT) window in the daily life is essential for understanding habitual sleep and health. Although actigraphy devices (accelerometers) placement varies across studies, most SPT-detection algorithms are developed for wrist data. Open-source algorithms support reproducibility and transparency in estimating the SPT. AimsTo optimise and evaluate two open-source algorithms, HDCZA and HorAngle, for estimating the SPT window using hip-worn accelerometer data. MethodsA total of 109 children and 194 adults wore wrist and hip accelerometers for six nights and completed sleep diaries. An established algorithm combining wrist and diary data served as the reference. HDCZA and HorAngle parameters were optimised using Bayesian optimisation on 60% of the sample and evaluated in the remaining 40%. ResultsMean differences for sleep onset and wake-up were -3 and 4 minutes for HDCZA (limits of agreement [LoA]: -221,215 and -185,194; root-mean square error [RMSE]=111 and 97) and 0 and -4 minutes for HorAngle (LoA: -199,199 and -223,214; RMSE=111 and 112). For SPT duration, mean differences were 7 minutes (LoA: -252,266; RMSE=132) for HDCZA and -4 minutes (LoA: -254,246; RMSE=128). No significant differences in SPT duration were found (P=0.774; P=0.237). Both algorithms showed moderate agreement with the reference in ranking sleep duration ({kappa} {approx} 0.56-0.58). Differences were unrelated to age or sex but linked to non-wear time. ConclusionsBoth open-source algorithms demonstrated value for estimating the SPT window from hip data. While HDCZA requires no additional sensor-specific parameters, HorAngle depends on accurate axis identification. Statement of SignificanceAccurately estimating the sleep period time (SPT) window from hip-worn accelerometers is essential for studies assessing sleep in free-living conditions. However, most available algorithms were developed for wrist-worn data. This study optimised and validated two open-source algorithms, HDCZA and HorAngle, for hip-worn accelerometer data in children and adults. Both algorithms performed comparably to a wrist-based reference using sleep diaries, showing consistent agreement across age and sex. These methods enable researchers to estimate habitual sleep without additional sensors or diaries, improving reproducibility and scalability in observational research. The algorithms are openly implemented in the GGIR R package, offering accessible and standardised tools for analysing hip-based accelerometer data.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Discrimination of sleep and wake periods from a hip-worn raw acceleration sensor using recurrent neural networks 96%
- Home-EEG assessment of possible compensatory mechanisms for sleep disruption in highly irregular shift workers - The ANCHOR study 96%
- A clinical trial to evaluate the dayzz smartphone app on employee sleep, health, and productivity at a large US employer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel Digital Markers of Sleep Dynamics: A Causal Inference Approach Revealing Age and Gender Phenotypes in Obstructive Sleep Apnea 94%
- Topographical relocation of adolescent sleep spindles reveals a new maturational pattern of the human brain 94%
- Sleep Regularity Index as a Novel Indicator of Sleep Disturbance in Stroke Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Effects of Behavioral Circadian Rhythm Disruption in Shift-Working Police Academy Trainees 95%
- Regular caffeine intake attenuates REM sleep promotion and sleep quality in healthy men 92%
- The combination of topological data analysis and mathematical modeling improves sleep stage prediction from consumer-grade wearables 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.