Back

Injury-Induced Remodeling of Junctional Actin Bands in the Vestibular Maculae of Mice and Chicks: Implications for Sensory Regeneration

Warchol, M. E.

2025-11-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.11.24.682866 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The vestibular organs of birds are capable of regenerating sensory hair cells after ototoxic injury, but the regenerative ability of the mammalian vestibular organs is much more limited. The factors that inhibit regeneration in the mammalian inner ear are not known, but it has been proposed that the structure of filamentous actin cables at cell-cell junctions within the sensory epithelium may be an important regulatory influence. Junctional actin cables in the chick utricle are relatively thin, while those in mouse utricle are much thicker. These differences result in differing mechanical properties of the avian vs. mammalian inner ear, which may affect the potential for regenerative proliferation. The present study characterized injury-evoked changes in junctional actin cables in the utricles of mice and chicks. We found that the thickness of junctional cables in the chick utricle was not affected by ototoxic injury, but that injury to the mouse utricle led to the formation of many new junctional actin bands whose thickness was comparable to those in the chick utricle. Thicker actin bands persisted after injury, but were not necessarily associated with cellular junctions. In addition, the relative extent of supporting cell expansion in the injured chick utricle was larger than that in the mouse utricle, which may affect activation of Hippo/YAP signaling in both species. Together, these data point to important differences in actin cable plasticity in the avian vs. mammalian utricle that may partially account for their differing regenerative abilities.

Published in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · published here
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.9%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
6
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
7
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.7%
11
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Neuroscience Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
14
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
17
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Journal of Comparative Neurology
73 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
25
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%