Back

RNA at Lipid/Water Interfaces: Molecular Insights from Coarse-Grained Simulations and Reflectivity Data Predictions

Ibrahim, M.; Koefinger, J.; Zacharias, M.; Schneck, E.; Schwierz, N.

2026-02-04 biophysics
10.1101/2025.11.21.689668 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Interactions between RNA and lipids are fundamental for biological processes and are increasingly exploited for RNA delivery by lipid nanoparticles. However, RNA-lipid interactions remain challenging to characterize at the molecular level. Here, we address the modeling of RNA at lipid/water interfaces using coarse-grained (CG) simulations, experimental validation using scattering data and prediction of neutron (NR) and X-ray reflectivity (XRR) profiles from the simulations. Using neutral DOPC and cationic DOTAP bilayers, we show that lipid-RNA interactions depend strongly on RNA secondary structure, with single-stranded regions exhibiting higher interfacial affinity than double-stranded segments. We validate the CG lipid simulations, showing that while they reproduce experimental X-ray scattering data only qualitatively, the agreement improves markedly after backmap-ping to atomistic resolution followed by energy minimization and short all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. We further simulated distinct tRNA conformations and analyzed the influence of RNA secondary structure, concentration, solvent contrast, and lipid deuteration on NR and XRR signals identifying the conditions under which such experiments probe RNA adsorption and discriminate between different RNA conformations. Together, these results demonstrate that CG simulations combined with reflectivity data provide a powerful approach to probe RNA adsorption and structure at lipid/water interfaces and support the design and interpretation of scattering experiments. TOC Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=109 SRC="FIGDIR/small/689668v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9a1297org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13aa90dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@30a68corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@662aa_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
5
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
7
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.0%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.0%
10
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
12
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
15
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
25
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
27
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%