Back

Delayed introduction and susceptible variation drive spatial asynchrony in pertussis epidemics

Park, S. W.

2025-11-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.11.21.25340758 medRxiv
Show abstract

Infectious disease outbreaks typically exhibit a large-scale spatial synchrony, reflecting coupling through shared environmental forcing and human mobility. A few exceptions to this theoretical expectation have been reported, but the conditions under which synchrony breaks down remain poorly understood. South Koreas 2024-2025 pertussis outbreak provides a striking example, during which epidemic trajectories diverged substantially throughout the country: notably, the decline in spatial synchrony with distance was more pronounced than that reported in many previous outbreaks. Integrating high-resolution surveillance data from 252 municipalities and a Bayesian transmission model, I show that heterogeneity in introduction timing and differences in local contact levels can drive such fine-scale asynchrony even when all locations share identical seasonal forcing for transmission rates. In particular, regional variation in baseline contact levels can drive differential levels of susceptible depletion, thus shaping the potential for multiple epidemic waves. This analysis offers a unique perspective on spatiotemporal epidemic dynamics that depart from classical epidemic theory.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.8%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.8%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.8%
4
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
6
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.5%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
10
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
11
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.9%
19
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
21
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%