Back

An Improved Pipeline for Constructing UK Biobank Brain Imaging Confounds

Radosavljevic, L.; Maullin-Sapey, T.; Alfaro-Almagro, F.; McCarthy, P.; Nichols, T. E.; Smith, S.

2025-11-22 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.11.21.25340740 medRxiv
Show abstract

UK Biobank (UKB) brain imaging data is a one-of-a-kind resource for studying the links between the brain and demographic-, lifestyle- and genetic data. When establishing such links, it is crucial to account for confounding effects caused by the acquisition of fMRI images, as well as demographic confounding factors. UKB brain imaging confounds are constructed through variable selection by the proportion of variance explained in the Imaging Derived Phenotypes (IDPs), from tens of thousands of possible confounds. The current implementation of this pipeline is very computationally intensive and has a large memory footprint, largely due to the varying patterns of missing data in IDPs. This makes it impractical for many users of UK Biobank brain imaging data. We propose a fast and memory efficient multivariate pipeline for constructing imaging confounds using mean imputation combined with a bias-corrected estimator of R2, the proportion of confound variance explained in an IDP. Building on this, we also improve the pipeline in order to better select confounds that explain unique variance in IDPs, and non-imaging variables of interest, so called nIDPs. The new implementation leads to a more compact set of confounds that explains roughly the same amount of variance, and runs in around 1 hour on a single CPU.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.1%
3
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
4
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.9%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
5.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
9
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.3%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.3%
11
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
12
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
14
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
European Journal of Epidemiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%
25
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
27
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%